Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Focality and Asymmetry in Multi-battle Contests

Subhasish Chowdhury, Dan Kovenock, David Rojo Arjona and Nathaniel Wilcox

Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute

Abstract: This article examines behavior in two-person constant-sum Colonel Blotto games in which each player maximizes the expected total value of the battlefields won. A lottery contest success function is employed in each battlefield. Recent experimental research on such games provides only partial support for Nash equilibrium behavior. We hypothesize that the salience of battlefields affects strategic behavior (the salient target hypothesis). We present a controlled test of this hypothesis – against Nash predictions – when the sources of salience come from certain asymmetries in either battlefield values or labels (as in Schelling (1960)). In both cases, subjects over-allocate the resource to the salient battlefields relative to the Nash prediction. However, the effect is stronger with salient values. In the absence of salience, we replicate previous results in the literature supporting the Nash prediction.

Keywords: Conflict; Experiment; Colonel Blotto; Focal point; Asymmetry (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 C91 D72 D74 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp and nep-gth
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.chapman.edu/research-and-institutions/e ... ity-contest-2016.pdf

Related works:
Journal Article: Focality and Asymmetry in Multi-Battle Contests (2021) Downloads
Working Paper: Focality and asymmetry in multi-battle contests (2016) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chu:wpaper:16-16

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Chapman University, Economic Science Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Megan Luetje ().

 
Page updated 2024-11-28
Handle: RePEc:chu:wpaper:16-16