Preference Heterogeneity and Optimal Capital Income Taxation

Mikhail Golosov, Aleh Tayvinski and Matthew Weinzierl ()

STICERD - Public Economics Programme Discussion Papers from Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE

Abstract: We analytically and quantitatively examine a prominent justi.cation for capital income taxation: goods preferred by those with high ability ought to be taxed. We study an environment where commodity taxes are allowed to be nonlinear functions of income and consumption and .nd that, when ability is positively related to a preference for a good, optimal marginal commodity taxes on this good may be regressive: i.e., declining with income. We derive an analytical expression for optimal commodity taxation, allowing us to study the forces for and against regressivity. We then parameterize the model to evidence on the relationship between skills and preferences and examine the quantitative case for taxes on future consumption (saving). The relationship between skill and time preference delivers quantitatively small, generally regressive capital income taxes and would justify only a fraction of the prevailing level of capital income taxation.JCKNMLNHOGJE

Date: 2010-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/pep/pep04.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Preference heterogeneity and optimal capital income taxation (2013)
Working Paper: Preference heterogeneity and optimal capital income taxation (2010)
Working Paper: Preference Heterogeneity and Optimal Capital Income Taxation (2010)
Working Paper: Preference Heterogeneity and Optimal Capital Income Taxation (2010)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cep:stippp:04

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in STICERD - Public Economics Programme Discussion Papers from Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().