Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

  EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Influence of different monetary regimes on financial stability in see countries

Zoran Grubisic () and Perisa Ivanovic ()
Additional contact information
Zoran Grubisic: Belgrade banking acadamy - Faculty for banking, insurance & finance, Associate Professor
Perisa Ivanovic: Belgrade banking academy - Faculty for banking, insurance & finance, Associate Professor

Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2012, vol. 1, issue 1, 91-106

Abstract: This paper aims to address different monetary regimes in SEE countries and its performances regarding financial stability in the context of the current financial crisis. SEE countries seem to have been more pre-crisis vulnerable to financial and real shocks. Five countries are observed in this paper – Serbia, Croatia, Montenegro, FYR Macedonia and Bulgaria. Nowadays international capital flows are very important in determining performances of different monetary regimes. It shows the level of financial integration which is important element of the Mundell-Fleming`s model and the related principle of impossible trinity. In today’s economy with most countries being financially integrated, they are moving to either pure float or monetary union, and analysis in the SEE region supported the bipolar view regarding the exchange rate regime. However, the emergence of the crisis has caused a significant drop in FDI in these countries. This once more highlights the standpoint that FDI can be described as a double-edge sward. The massive inflow of foreign capital that made the boom years possible is now the source of a very large problem for the region because this region is highly indebted externally. Authors try to find the best definition of systemic financial risk and financial (in)stability in order to consider the key aspects of macro prudential policymaking in the SEE region. Recommendation in the paper for all SEE economies is immediate adoption of the Basel III standards with the argument to give macro prudential policy mandate to an explicit authority to conduct efficient and timely decision making.

Keywords: FDI; public debt; credit rating; monetary union; financial stability; macroprudential policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cbcg.me/repec/cbk/journl/vol1no1-5.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cbk:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:91-106

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice from Central bank of Montenegro Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

 
Page updated 2024-12-28
Handle: RePEc:cbk:journl:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:91-106