Reducing Partisanship in Judicial Elections Can Improve Judge Quality: Evidence from U.S. State Supreme Courts
Elliott Ash and
W. Bentley Macleod
No 22071, NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc
Abstract:
Should technocratic public officials be selected through politics or by merit? This paper explores how selection procedures influence the quality of selected officials in the context of U.S. state supreme courts for the years 1947-1994. In a unique set of natural experiments, state governments enacted a variety of reforms making judicial elections less partisan and establishing merit-based procedures that delegate selection to experts. We compare post-reform judges to pre-reform judges in their work quality, measured by forward citations to their opinions. In this setting we can hold constant contemporaneous incentives and the portfolio of cases, allowing us to produce causal estimates under an identification assumption of parallel trends in quality by judge starting year. We find that judges selected by nonpartisan processes (nonpartisan elections or technocratic merit commissions) produce higher-quality work than judges selected by partisan elections. These results are consistent with a representative voter model in which better technocrats are selected when the process has less partisan bias or better information regarding candidate ability.
JEL-codes: J24 K4 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hrm, nep-law, nep-lma, nep-pol and nep-ure
Note: LE LS POL
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published as Elliott Ash & W. Bentley MacLeod, 2021. "Reducing partisanship in judicial elections can improve judge quality: Evidence from U.S. state supreme courts," Journal of Public Economics, vol 201.
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.nber.org/papers/w22071.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Reducing partisanship in judicial elections can improve judge quality: Evidence from U.S. state supreme courts (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22071
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.nber.org/papers/w22071
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in NBER Working Papers from National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().