Comparison of experts in the non-additive case

Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques from Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1)

Abstract: We adapt the model of comparisons of experts initiated by Lehrer (“Comparison of experts JME 98”) to a context of uncertainty which cannot be modelised by expected utility. We examine the robustness of Lehrer in this new context. Unlike expected utility, there exist several ways to define the strategies allowing to compare the experts, we propose some of them which guarantee a positive value of information

Keywords: Non-additive preferences; experts (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D80 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2006-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00130451 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparison of experts in the non-additive case (2006)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mse:wpsorb:b06088

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Cahiers de la Maison des Sciences Economiques from Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lucie Label ().