Backing out of private pension provision - Lessons from Germany
Michael Ziegelmeyer and
Julius Nick ()
Additional contact information
Julius Nick: Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Postal: Amalienstr. 33, D-80799 Munich
No 201211, MEA discussion paper series from Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy
Abstract:
Financing pensions in the EU is a challenge. Many EU countries introduced private pension schemes to compensate declining public pension levels due to reforms made necessary by demographic change. In 2001, Germany introduced the Riester pension. Ten years after introduction the prevalence rate of this voluntary private pension scheme approximates 37%. However, numerous criticisms raise doubts that the market for Riester products is transparent. Using the 2010 German SAVE survey, this paper investigates for the first time terminated and dormant Riester contracts on a household level. Respectively 14.5% and 12.5% of households who own or have owned a Riester contract terminated it or stopped paying contributions. We find that around 45% of terminated or dormant Riester contracts are caused at least partly by product-related reasons, which is significantly higher than for endowment life insurance contracts. Uptake of a new contract after a termination is more likely if termination is productrelated. Nevertheless, after a termination 73% of households do not sign a new contract, which can have serious long-term consequences for old-age income. Households with low income, low financial wealth or low pension literacy are more likely to have terminated or dormant contracts. Low income and low financial wealth households also have the lowest prevalence rate of Riester contracts and are at higher risk of old-age poverty.
JEL-codes: D12 D14 D91 J26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012-08-20
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://mea.mpisoc.mpg.de/uploads/user_mea_discussionpapers/1280_11-2012.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Backing out of private pension provision: lessons from Germany (2013)
Working Paper: Backing out of private pension provision - Lessons from Germany (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mea:meawpa:201211
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in MEA discussion paper series from Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy, Amalienstraße 33, 80799 München, Germany.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Henning Frankenberger ().