Abstract
Study question
Has birthweight (BW) changed over time among IVF-conceived singletons?Summary answer
Singleton BW has increased markedly over the past 25 years.What is known already
IVF conceived singletons have had a higher incidence of low BW compared to spontaneously conceived singletons, and this has raised concerns over long-term increased risks of cardio-metabolic disease. However, few causal links between IVF procedures and BW have been robustly established, and few studies have examined whether BW has changed over time as IVF techniques have developed.Study design, size, duration
A total of 2780 live born singletons conceived via IVF or ICSI treated in the reproductive medicine department of a single publicly funded tertiary care centre between 1991 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome measure was singleton BW adjusted for gestational age, maternal parity and child gender. Multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate the associations between patient prognostic factors and IVF treatment procedures with adjusted BW.Participants/materials, setting, methods
All singletons conceived at the centre following IVF/ICSI using the mother's own oocytes, and non-donated fresh or frozen/thawed embryos with complete electronic data records, were investigated. Available electronic records were retrieved from the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority for dataset collation. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate associations between IVF treatment parameters and BW, after adjusting for the year of treatment and patient characteristics and pregnancy factors.Main results and the role of chance
In the primary multivariable model, singleton BW increased by 7.4 g per year (95% CI: 3.2-11.6 g, P = 0.001), an increase of close to 180 g throughout the 25-year period after accounting for gestational age, maternal parity, child gender, IVF treatment parameters, patient prognostic characteristics and pregnancy factors. Fresh and frozen embryo transfer-conceived singletons showed a similar increase in BW. Frozen/thawed embryo transfer conceived singletons were on average 53 g heavier than their fresh embryo conceived counterparts (95% CI: 3.7-103.3 g, P = 0.035).Limitations, reasons for caution
The independent variables included in the study were limited to those that have been consistently recorded and stored electronically over the past two decades.Wider implications of the findings
There has been a progressive BW increase in IVF singletons over time in one large centre with consistent treatment eligibility criteria. Such a change is not seen in the general population of live born singletons in the UK or other developed countries, and seems to be specific to this IVF population. This may be a reflection of changes in practice such as undisturbed extended embryo culture to the blastocyst stage, optimized commercial culture media composition, single embryo transfer and ICSI. Moreover, singletons conceived from frozen/thawed embryos had higher birth weights when compared to their fresh embryo transfer counterparts. The causal pathway is unknown; however, it could be due to the impact on embryos of the freeze/thaw process, self-selection of embryos from couples who produce a surplus of embryos, and/or embryo replacement into a more receptive maternal environment.Study funding/competing interest(s)
This work was supported by the EU FP7 project grant, EpiHealthNet (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN-317146). The authors have no competing interests to declare.Trial registration number
N/A.Full text links
Read article at publisher's site: https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez025
Read article for free, from open access legal sources, via Unpaywall: https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/files/104988531/Attached_file_HUMREP_18_0856.R1_edit_HFS_CC.docx
Citations & impact
Impact metrics
Citations of article over time
Alternative metrics
Smart citations by scite.ai
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been
supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1093/humrep/dez025
Article citations
Antibiotics and lectin C for diarrhea control intervention in piglets and influences.
AMB Express, 14(1):126, 14 Nov 2024
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 39542996 | PMCID: PMC11564646
Long-term health risk of offspring born from assisted reproductive technologies.
J Assist Reprod Genet, 41(3):527-550, 26 Dec 2023
Cited by: 2 articles | PMID: 38146031
Review
Perinatal outcomes in 13,626 singleton pregnancies after autologous IVF across three continents over 7 years.
J Assist Reprod Genet, 40(11):2649-2657, 13 Sep 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 37700077 | PMCID: PMC10643744
Association of duration of embryo culture with risk of large for gestational age delivery in cryopreserved embryo transfer cycles.
Fertil Steril, 121(5):814-823, 05 Jan 2024
Cited by: 1 article | PMID: 38185197 | PMCID: PMC11488678
Growth of twins conceived using assisted reproductive treatments up to 5 years old: a national growth cohort.
Hum Reprod, 38(4):751-761, 01 Apr 2023
Cited by: 0 articles | PMID: 36763679 | PMCID: PMC10068277
Go to all (15) article citations
Similar Articles
To arrive at the top five similar articles we use a word-weighted algorithm to compare words from the Title and Abstract of each citation.
The influence of the type of embryo culture medium on neonatal birthweight after single embryo transfer in IVF.
Hum Reprod, 27(9):2619-2626, 12 Jul 2012
Cited by: 69 articles | PMID: 22791752
Obstetric and perinatal risks in 4601 singletons and 884 twins conceived after fresh blastocyst transfers: a Nordic study from the CoNARTaS group.
Hum Reprod, 35(4):805-815, 01 Apr 2020
Cited by: 17 articles | PMID: 32294185
Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique?
Hum Reprod, 29(3):618-627, 09 Jan 2014
Cited by: 119 articles | PMID: 24413766
Is frozen embryo transfer better for mothers and babies? Can cumulative meta-analysis provide a definitive answer?
Hum Reprod Update, 24(1):35-58, 01 Jan 2018
Cited by: 191 articles | PMID: 29155965
Review
Funding
Funders who supported this work.
EU FP7
EpiHealthNet (1)
Grant ID: FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN -317146