Europe PMC
Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Europe PMC requires Javascript to function effectively.

Either your web browser doesn't support Javascript or it is currently turned off. In the latter case, please turn on Javascript support in your web browser and reload this page.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


We examined the ability of an electromechanical device to produce consistent and incomplete thoracic (T9) spinal cord injuries in rats by brief displacement (Dspl) of the exposed dural surface. Open field walking, inclined plane, grid walking, and footprint analysis, and a determination of the percentage of tissue spared at the lesion center were used to assess chronic outcome (6 weeks postinjury). Laminectomy control animals showed no evidence of a functional deficit or histologic lesion. Complete spinal cord transections in normal rats and in a group of animals previously injured (1.1 mm Dspl) and allowed to recover resulted in complete loss of hindlimb function, demonstrating an important functional role for the remaining spared fibers at the lesion site. Consistent spinal cord displacements (0.80 mm, 0.95 mm, and 1.10 mm) resulted in behavioral groups with low outcome variability over a narrow range of incomplete recovery of neurologic function. Significant behavioral (open field walking, inclined plane, and grid walking) and histologic differences were found between the control and Dspl groups and between the 0.80 mm and 1.10 mm Dspl groups. Significant correlations were observed among the injury parameters, behavioral, and histologic scores. Open field walking and inclined plane performance were sensitive indicators of both the early and late phases of neurologic recovery. Grid walking was most useful in animals with small chronic residual deficits. The footprint analysis resulted in less significant correlations and differences between the behavioral groups than the other outcome measures. This may result from a relatively narrow range of sensitivity (open field walking scores between 3.3 and 4.0) and increased variability within the groups.

References 


Articles referenced by this article (44)


Show 10 more references (10 of 44)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Citations of article over time

Alternative metrics

Altmetric item for https://www.altmetric.com/details/46051613
Altmetric
Discover the attention surrounding your research
https://www.altmetric.com/details/46051613

Smart citations by scite.ai
Smart citations by scite.ai include citation statements extracted from the full text of the citing article. The number of the statements may be higher than the number of citations provided by EuropePMC if one paper cites another multiple times or lower if scite has not yet processed some of the citing articles.
Explore citation contexts and check if this article has been supported or disputed.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1089/neu.1992.9.197

Supporting
Mentioning
Contrasting
4
113
1

Article citations


Go to all (163) article citations

Funding 


Funders who supported this work.

NINDS NIH HHS (2)