poster

Using Scalable, Interactive Floor Projection for Production Planning Scenario

Authors:

Michael Otto,

Michael Prieur,

Enrico RukzioAuthors Info & Claims

ITS '14: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces

Pages 363 - 368

https://doi.org/10.1145/2669485.2669547

Published: 16 November 2014 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel system for interactive evaluation and verification of manual assembly processes. The approach utilizes a scalable, interactive augmented floor surface in combination with a tangible tabletop hardware and a material zone planning software. The floor projection hardware is used for true to scale assembly station layout visualizations. The advantages and drawbacks of a low-cost, true to scale visualization will be discussed. A preliminary evaluation of the proposed system during a production planning workshop has shown that the low-cost implementation is suitable for reaching the production planning goals. Additionally true to scale visualizations support users to estimate distances, speeds and spatial relationships within the digital layout. In future work, motion capture and tracking systems will be integrated and registered to the augmented floor surface area, the projection area will be extended and efficiency improvements will be showed up.

References

[1]

H. Ishii, "Tangible bits: beyond pixels", in Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, 2008, S. xv--xxv.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

M. Manns und N. A. A. Martin, "A Vagueness Measure for Concurrent Engineering of Manual Assembly Lines", in Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability, M. F. Zaeh, Hrsg. Springer International Publishing, 2014, S. 131--135.

Google Scholar

[3]

J. C. Aurich, D. Ostermayer, und C. H. Wagenknecht, "Improvement of manufacturing processes with virtual reality-based CIP workshops", Int. J. Prod. Res., Bd. 47, Nr. 19, S. 5297--5309, 2009.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[4]

T. Augsten, K. Kaefer, R. Meusel, C. Fetzer, D. Kanitz, T. Stoff, T. Becker, C. Holz, und P. Baudisch, "Multitoe: high-precision interaction with back-projected floors based on high-resolution multi-touch input", in Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, 2010, S. 209--218.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

C. Pinhanez, "The everywhere displays projector: A device to create ubiquitous graphical interfaces", in Ubicomp 2001: Ubiquitous Computing, 2001, S. 315--331.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Funke JWolf MVan Onzenoodt CRogers KRopinski TRukzio E(2024)A Wall I Enjoy: Motivating Gentle Full-Body Movements Through Touchwall Interaction Compared to Standing and Sitting Smartphone UsageProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656302(201-218)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639701.3656302
Umezu NYuming B(2022)Floor Projection with QR code-based Interactions and Visitor Drawings2022 IEEE 11th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)10.1109/GCCE56475.2022.10014058(318-320)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/GCCE56475.2022.10014058
Franz JMalloch JReilly D(2020)Compensating for Perspective-based Distortion on Large Interactive Floor Displays: the SpaceHopper Field ExperimentProceedings of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3391614.3393651(45-54)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3391614.3393651
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Using Scalable, Interactive Floor Projection for Production Planning Scenario
1. Human-centered computing

Recommendations

EMO-based architectural room floor planning
SMC'09: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE international conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

We propose a spatial plan generator based on our spatial planning algorithm and spatial growth rules, combine it with evolutionary multi-objective optimization, apply the system to architectural room floor planning, and evaluate its potential as a ...
Integrated versus hierarchical approach to aggregate production planning and master production scheduling

The hierarchical planning concept is commonly used for production planning. Dividing the planning process into subprocesses which are solved separately in the order of the hierarchy decreases the complexity and fits the common organizational structure. ...
Planning horizons for master production scheduling
Abstract
Production and operations planning in organizations quite often is a multi‐level sequential process, involving aggregate planning, master production scheduling, and detailed operations planning and scheduling. To obtain good planning results, it ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

ITS '14: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces

November 2014

524 pages

ISBN:9781450325875

DOI:10.1145/2669485

General Chairs:
Raimund Dachselt
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
,
Nicholas Graham
Queen's University, Canada
,
Program Chairs:
Kasper Hornbæk
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
,
Miguel Nacenta
University of St. Andrews, UK

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 November 2014

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Poster

Conference

ITS '14

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

ITS '14: Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces

November 16 - 19, 2014

Dresden, Germany

Acceptance Rates

ITS '14 Paper Acceptance Rate 31 of 112 submissions, 28%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 119 of 418 submissions, 28%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

10
Total Citations
View Citations
301
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Funke JWolf MVan Onzenoodt CRogers KRopinski TRukzio E(2024)A Wall I Enjoy: Motivating Gentle Full-Body Movements Through Touchwall Interaction Compared to Standing and Sitting Smartphone UsageProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656302(201-218)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3639701.3656302
Umezu NYuming B(2022)Floor Projection with QR code-based Interactions and Visitor Drawings2022 IEEE 11th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE)10.1109/GCCE56475.2022.10014058(318-320)Online publication date: 18-Oct-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/GCCE56475.2022.10014058
Franz JMalloch JReilly D(2020)Compensating for Perspective-based Distortion on Large Interactive Floor Displays: the SpaceHopper Field ExperimentProceedings of the 2020 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3391614.3393651(45-54)Online publication date: 17-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3391614.3393651
Otto MLampen EAgethen PZachmann GRukzio E(2020)Using large-scale augmented floor surfaces for industrial applications and evaluation on perceived sizesPersonal and Ubiquitous Computing10.1007/s00779-020-01433-z26:3(721-736)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01433-z
Ludwig TDöll MKotthaus CHarrison SBardzell SNeustaedter CTatar D(2019)"The Printer is Telling Me about Itself"Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3322276.3322342(331-344)Online publication date: 18-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3322276.3322342
Otto MLampen EAgethen PLangohr MMasan GRukzio EKhamis MSorce SCauchard JGentile V(2019)Evaluation on perceived sizes using large-scale augmented floor visualization devicesProceedings of the 8th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays10.1145/3321335.3324951(1-7)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3321335.3324951
Büttner SMucha HFunk MKosch TAehnelt MRobert SRöcker C(2017)The Design Space of Augmented and Virtual Reality Applications for Assistive Environments in ManufacturingProceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments10.1145/3056540.3076193(433-440)Online publication date: 21-Jun-2017
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3056540.3076193
Wang XOng SNee A(2017)A comprehensive survey of ubiquitous manufacturing researchInternational Journal of Production Research10.1080/00207543.2017.141325956:1-2(604-628)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2017
https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1413259
Otto MPrieur MAgethen PRukzio E(2016)Dual Reality for Production Verification Workshops: A Comprehensive Set of Virtual MethodsProcedia CIRP10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.14044(38-43)Online publication date: 2016
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.140
Büttner SSand ORöcker CBoring SRukzio EGellersen HHinckley K(2015)Extending the Design Space in Industrial Manufacturing Through Mobile ProjectionProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct10.1145/2786567.2794342(1130-1133)Online publication date: 24-Aug-2015
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2786567.2794342

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

EMO-based architectural room floor planning

Integrated versus hierarchical approach to aggregate production planning and master production scheduling

Planning horizons for master production scheduling