Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/3237383.3238119acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Task Fusion Heuristics for Coalition Formation and Planning

Published: 09 July 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Automating planning for large teams of heterogeneous robots is a growing challenge. The planning literature incorporates expressive features, but examples that scale to multiple robots in complex domains are limited and fail to generate feasible plans. The Coalition Formation then Planning framework accelerates planning by decomposing the robots into coalitions, allocating tasks to each coalition, and planning each task separately. However, the task decomposition limits cooperation between coalitions and results in many nonexecutable plans. The presented Task Fusion heuristics fuse coalition-task pairs, resulting in higher success rates by leveraging relaxed plans to estimate couplings between tasks and determine the coalition-task pairs to be fused. The heuristics are compared to baseline methods across randomly generated problems that incorporate temporal and continuous constraints.

References

[1]
Ron Alterovitz, Sven Koenig, and Maxim Likhachev. 2016. Robot planning in the real world: Research challenges and opportunities. AI Magazine 2 (2016), 76--84.
[2]
Daniel Bryce, Sicun Gao, David J. Musliner, and Robert P. Goldman. 2015. SMT-based nonlinear PDDL
[3]
planning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3247--3253.
[4]
Amanda J. Coles, Andrew I. Coles, Maria Fox, and Derek Long. 2011. POPF2: A forward-chaining partial order planner. The International Planning Competition. 65--70.
[5]
Amanda J. Coles, Andrew I. Coles, Maria Fox, and Derek Long. 2012. COLIN: Planning with continuous linear numeric change. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (2012), 1--96.
[6]
Anton Dukeman. 2017. Hybrid mission planning with coalition formation. Ph.D. Dissertation. bibinfoschoolVanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenessee.
[7]
Anton Dukeman and Julie A. Adams. 2017. Hybrid mission planning with coalition formation. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Vol. 31, 6 (Nov. 2017), 1424--1466.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
AAMAS '18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems
July 2018
2312 pages

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

Richland, SC

Publication History

Published: 09 July 2018

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. coalition formation
  2. continuous planning
  3. temporal planning

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

Conference

AAMAS '18
Sponsor:
AAMAS '18: Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems
July 10 - 15, 2018
Stockholm, Sweden

Acceptance Rates

AAMAS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 149 of 607 submissions, 25%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 101
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media