Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/2133036.2133084acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessodaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Algorithms for implicit hitting set problems

Published: 23 January 2011 Publication History

Abstract

A hitting set for a collection of sets is a set that has a non-empty intersection with each set in the collection; the hitting set problem is to find a hitting set of minimum cardinality. Motivated by instances of the hitting set problem where the number of sets to be hit is large, we introduce the notion of implicit hitting set problems. In an implicit hitting set problem the collection of sets to be hit is typically too large to list explicitly; instead, an oracle is provided which, given a set H, either determines that H is a hitting set or returns a set that H does not hit. We show a number of examples of classic implicit hitting set problems, and give a generic algorithm for solving such problems optimally. The main contribution of this paper is to show that this framework is valuable in developing approximation algorithms. We illustrate this methodology by presenting a simple on-line algorithm for the minimum feedback vertex set problem on random graphs. In particular our algorithm gives a feedback vertex set of size n - (1/p) log np(1 - o(1)) with probability at least 3/4 for the random graph Gn,p (the smallest feedback vertex set is of size n - (2/p) log np(1 + o(1))). We also consider a planted model for the feedback vertex set in directed random graphs. Here we show that a hitting set for a polynomial-sized subset of cycles is a hitting set for the planted random graph and this allows us to exactly recover the planted feedback vertex set.

References

[1]
{AKS98} N. Alon, M. Krivelevich, and B. Sudakov, Finding a large hidden clique in a random graph, SODA '98: Proceedings of the ninth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms (Philadelphia, PA, USA), Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1998, pp. 594--598.
[2]
{dAP07} Wladimir de Azevedo Pribitkin, Simple upper bounds for partition functions, The Ramanujan Journal 18 (2007), no. 1, 113--119.
[3]
{FdlV86} W. Fernandez de la Vega, Induced trees in sparse random graphs, Graphs and Combinatorics 2 (1986), 227--231.
[4]
{FdlV96} W. Fernandez de la Vega, The largest induced tree in a sparse random graph, Random Struct. Algorithms 9 (1996), no. 1--2, 93--97.
[5]
{FK08} A. Frieze and R. Kannan, A new approach to the planted clique problem, IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science (FSTTCS 2008) (Dagstuhl, Germany), Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), vol. 2, Schloss Dagstuhl--Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, 2008, pp. 187--198.
[6]
{Fri90} A. M. Frieze, On the independence number of random graphs, Discrete Math. 81 (1990), no. 2, 171--175.
[7]
{GM75} G. Grimmett and C. McDiarmid, On colouring random graphs, Mathematical Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophical Society 77 (1975), 313--324.
[8]
{Jer92} M. Jerrum, Large cliques elude the metropolis process, Random Structures and Algorithms 3 (1992), 347--359.
[9]
{Kar72} R. Karp, Reducibility among combinatorial problems, Complexity of Computer Computations(R.E. Miller and J. W. Thatcher, eds.) (1972), 85--103.
[10]
{KMC} R. Karp and E. Moreno-Centeno, Implicit hitting set problems, Manuscript in preparation.
[11]
{Lit88} N. Littlestone, Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abount: A new linear threshold algorithm, Machine Learning 2 (1988), 285--318.
[12]
{McD84} C. McDiarmid, Colouring random graphs, Annals of Operations Research 1 (1984), 183--200.
[13]
{SS08} J. Spencer and C. R. Subramanian, On the size of induced acyclic subgraphs in random digraphs, Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science 10 (2008), no. 2, 47--54.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Approximate denial constraintsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3401960.340196613:10(1682-1695)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2021
  • (2019)On relating explanations and adversarial examplesProceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3454287.3455710(15883-15893)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2019
  • (2019)Model-based diagnosis with multiple observationsProceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3367032.3367190(1108-1115)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2019
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SODA '11: Proceedings of the twenty-second annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
January 2011
1785 pages

Sponsors

Publisher

Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics

United States

Publication History

Published: 23 January 2011

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SODA '11
Sponsor:
SODA '11: 22nd ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
January 23 - 25, 2011
California, San Francisco

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 411 of 1,322 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Approximate denial constraintsProceedings of the VLDB Endowment10.14778/3401960.340196613:10(1682-1695)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2021
  • (2019)On relating explanations and adversarial examplesProceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems10.5555/3454287.3455710(15883-15893)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2019
  • (2019)Model-based diagnosis with multiple observationsProceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/3367032.3367190(1108-1115)Online publication date: 10-Aug-2019
  • (2018)ObscuroProceedings of the 34th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference10.1145/3274694.3274750(692-701)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2018
  • (2016)Propositional abduction with implicit hitting setsProceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1327(1327-1335)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2016
  • (2015)Solving QBF by clause selectionProceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.5555/2832249.2832294(325-331)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2015

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media