Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/2772879.2772950acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaamasConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Are Aggressive Agents as Scary as Aggressive Humans?

Published: 04 May 2015 Publication History

Abstract

Most research into intelligent virtual agents focuses on agents with a positive stance towards the user. Nevertheless, the development of virtual agents that show aggressive behavior may also be interesting for a range of application domains, varying from aggression de-escalation training to anti-bullying education. However, ensuring that such aggressive agents achieve the desired effect is not easy, as they need to be believable in a number of aspects. In particular, they need to bring their human conversation partners into a serious state of anxiety. To investigate to what extent this can be achieved using state-of-the-art virtual agent technology, an experiment was performed in which the impact of an aggressive virtual agent was compared with that of an aggressive human. By randomly distributing a group of 28 participants over two conditions (virtual and human) and measuring their physiological and subjective emotional state before and after an aggressive outburst of their conversation partner, the difference between virtual and human aggression was studied. The results point out that both types of aggression induced a substantial stress response, but that the impact of the human aggression was higher than that of the virtual aggression.

References

[1]
Anderson, L. N. and Clarke, J. T. (1996). De-escalating verbal aggression in primary care settings. Nurse Pract. 21(10):95, 98, 101--2.
[2]
Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., and Shimodaira, H. (eds.) (2013). Intelligent Virtual Agents. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, IVA'13. Lecture Notes on Computer Science, Springer Verlag, vol. 8108.
[3]
Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Alcañiz, M., Liaño, V., Guerrero, B., Rey, B. (2004). Immersion and Emotion: Their Impact on the Sense of Presence. CyberPsychology & Behavior 7(6), 734--74.
[4]
Bates, J. (1994). The role of emotions in believable agents. Communications of the ACM, vol. 37, issue 7, pp. 122--125.
[5]
Bradley, M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M., and Lang, P. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45, 602--607.
[6]
Bosse, T. and Provoost, S. (2014). Towards Aggression De-escalation Training with Virtual Agents: A Computational Model. In: Proceedings of the 16th Int. Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI'14. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, pp. 375--387.
[7]
Brouwer, A. M., Neerincx, M. A., Kallen, V. L., van der Leer, L., ten Brinke, M. (2011). EEG alpha asymmetry, heart rate variability and cortisol in response to virtual reality induced stress. Journal of Cybertherapy & Rehabilitation 4(1), 21--34.
[8]
Cannon, W. (1932). Wisdom of the Body. United States: W.W. Norton & Company.
[9]
Chida, Y. and Hamer, M. (2008). Chronic psychosocial factors and acute physiological responses to laboratory-induced stress in healthy populations: a quantitative review of 30 years of investigations. Psychological Bulletin, 134 (6), 829--885.
[10]
Choi, A., Melo, C. M. de, Khooshabeh, P., Woo, W., and Gratch, J. (2015). Physiological evidence for a dual process model of the social effects of emotion in computers. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74, pp. 41--53.
[11]
Courtney, C. G., Dawson, M. E., Schell, A. M., Iyer, A., and Parsons, T. D. (2010). Better than the real thing: Eliciting fear with moving and static computer-generated stimuli. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78(2), 107--114.
[12]
De Angeli, A., Lynch, P., and Johnson, G. (2001). Personifying the e-market: A framework for social agents. In: M. Hirose (Ed.), Proceedings of Interact 2001. IOS Press, pp. 198--205.
[13]
DelBel, J. (2003). De-escalating workplace aggression. Nurning Management (USA) 34, 31--34.
[14]
Dodge, K. A. (1990). The structure and function of reactive and proactive aggression. In D. Pepler and H. Rubin, (eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 201--218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[15]
Figner, B. and Murphy, R. (2011). Using skin conductance in judgment and decision making research. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Kuehberger, & R. Ranyard (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research (pp. 163--184). New York: Psychology Press.
[16]
Geus, E. de and Doornen, L. van (1996). Ambulatory assessment of parasympathetic/sympathetic balance by impedance cardiography. In J. Fahrenberg, & M. Myrtek, Ambulatory Assessment. Computer assisted psychological and psychophysiological methods in monitoring and field studies (pp. 141--164). Berlin: Hogrefe & Huber.
[17]
Gross, J. J. and Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition & Emotion, 9(1), 87--108.
[18]
Heuvelink, A. and Mioch, T. (2008). FeGA: A cognitive Feedback Generating Agent. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2008) (pp. 567--572). IEEE Computer Society Press.
[19]
Houtkamp, J. M., Schuurink, E. L., and Toet, A. (2008). Thunderstorms in my computer: the effect of visual dynamics and sound in a 3D environment. In: Bannatyne, M. & Counsell, J. (Eds.), Proc. of the Int. Conference on Visualisation in Built and Rural Environments BuiltViz'08, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, USA.
[20]
Kim, J., Hill, R. W., Durlach, P., Lane, H. C., Forbell, E., Core, C., Marsella, S. Pynadeth, D. and Hart, J. (2009) BiLAT: A game-based environment for practicing negotiation in a cultural context. International Journal of AI in Education, vol. 19, issue 3, pp. 289--308.
[21]
Lang, P. J, Bradley, M. M., and Cuthberth, B. N. (1999). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective ratings. Gainesville, Fl. The Cennter for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
[22]
Nieuwenhuys, A. and Oudejans, R. R. D. (2011). Training with anxiety: Short- and long-term effects on police officers' shooting behaviour under pressure. Cognitive Processing, 23 March 2011, 1--12.
[23]
Prendinger, H., Becker-Asano, C., and Ishizuka, M. (2006). A study in users' physiological response to an empathic interface agent. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 3(3):371--391.
[24]
Reekum, C. van, Johnstone, T., Banse, R., Etter, A., Wehrle, T., and Scherer, K. (2004). Psychophysiological responses to appraisal dimensions in a computer game. Cognition and Emotion, 18(5), 663--688.
[25]
Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, CA : CSLI Publications.
[26]
Rickel, J. (2001). Intelligent virtual agents for education and training: Opportunities and challenges. In A. de Antonio, R. Aylett, and D. Ballin (eds.), Intelligent Virtual Agents, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, vol. 2190, pp. 15--22.
[27]
Ritterfeld, U., Cody, M., and Vorderer, P. (eds.) (2009). Serious Games: Mechanisms and Effects. New York/London: Routledge.
[28]
Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, Gaggioli, A., D., Botella, C. and Alcañiz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: The link between presence and emotions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 45--56.
[29]
Rizzo, A. A., Reger, G., Gahm, G., Difede, J., and Rothbaum, B. O. (2008). Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy for Combat Related PTSD. In: Shiromani, P., Keane, T., and LeDoux, J. (eds.), Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: Basic Science and Clinical Practice, Springer Verlag.
[30]
Slater, M. and Wilbur, S. (1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(6).
[31]
Smith, J. C., Bradley, M. M., and Lang, P. J. (2005). State anxiety and affective physiology: effects of sustained exposure to affective pictures. Biological Psychology, 69(3), 247--260.
[32]
Smith, M. J. and Clarke, R. V. (2000). Crime and public transport. In R. Clarke (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (pp. 169--234). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
[33]
Traum, D. and Rickel, J. (2002). Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 766--773.
[34]
Villani, D., Repetto, C., Cipresso, P., and Riva, G. (2012). May I experience more presence in doing the same thing in virtual reality than in reality? An answer from a simulated job interview. Interacting with Computers, 24 (4), 265--272.
[35]
Visser, B., Looze, M. de, Graaff, M. de, and Dieën, J. van (2004). Effects of precision demands and mental pressure on muscle activation and hand forces in computer mouse tasks. Ergonomics, 47 (2), 202--217.
[36]
Zoll, C., Enz, S., Schaub, H., Aylett, R., and Paiva, A. (2006). Fighting Bullying with the Help of Autonomous Agents in a Virtual School Environment. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (ICCM) .

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Experiencing Simulated Confrontations in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445401(1-10)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
  • (2018)Virtually BadProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3237885(1258-1266)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
  • (2016)An intelligent system for aggression de-escalation trainingProceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1805(1805-1811)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2016

Index Terms

  1. Are Aggressive Agents as Scary as Aggressive Humans?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    AAMAS '15: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
    May 2015
    2072 pages
    ISBN:9781450334136

    Sponsors

    • IFAAMAS

    In-Cooperation

    Publisher

    International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

    Richland, SC

    Publication History

    Published: 04 May 2015

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. aggression
    2. anxiety
    3. human-agent interaction

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research

    Conference

    AAMAS'15
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    AAMAS '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 108 of 670 submissions, 16%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,155 of 5,036 submissions, 23%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2021)Experiencing Simulated Confrontations in Virtual RealityProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3411764.3445401(1-10)Online publication date: 6-May-2021
    • (2018)Virtually BadProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems10.5555/3237383.3237885(1258-1266)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2018
    • (2016)An intelligent system for aggression de-escalation trainingProceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence10.3233/978-1-61499-672-9-1805(1805-1811)Online publication date: 29-Aug-2016

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media