Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying: an argumentation approach
Abstract
References
Index Terms
- Conflicting viewpoint relational database querying: an argumentation approach
Recommendations
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning
Inspired by legal reasoning, this paper presents a formal framework for assessing conflicting arguments. Its use is illustrated with applications to realistic legal examples, and the potential for implementation is discussed. The framework has the form ...
Computing Arguments and Attacks in Assumption-Based Argumentation
CaSAPI (Credulous and Skeptical Argumentation: Prolog Implementation) 3.0 determines the acceptability of claims, using the general-purpose framework of assumption-based argumentation, under the semantics of admissible extensions. This framework reduces ...
A structured argumentation system with backing and undercutting
This work introduces Extended Defeasible Logic Programming (E-DeLP), a structured argumentation system enabling the expression of reasons for and against using defeasible rules. E-DeLPextends the formalism of Defeasible Logic Programming (DeLP) by ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
- General Chairs:
- Ana Bazzan,
- Michael Huhns,
- Program Chairs:
- Alessio Lomuscio,
- Paul Scerri
Sponsors
- IFAAMAS
In-Cooperation
Publisher
International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems
Richland, SC
Publication History
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Poster
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 48Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in