Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/2557696.2557702acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A measure to assess combat effectiveness using network representation

Published: 07 July 2013 Publication History

Abstract

A conceptual definition of combat effectiveness is an overall capability of a force to produce a desired outcome from a combat against an enemy force. An ability to measure combat effectiveness is critical to strategic and tactical decision making, but it is a challenging task to develop an operational measure for combat effectiveness due to large complexity presented by a rich context of a combat environment. We argue that under a direct fire engagement combat effectiveness can be reasonably assessed by the number of attack opportunities a force creates in a combat environment. This paper proposes a measure to quantitatively measure combat effectiveness of a military force in a direct fire engagement environment. The proposed metric is based on a meta-network representation that captures various aspects of a combat environment. Using a meta-network representation, two types of basic unit structures of attack opportunity -- isolated and coordinated -- are identified, which are then used as a basic element of combat effectiveness. Prevalence of network motifs in a networked combat environment is computed as a measure of a military force's combat effectiveness.

References

[1]
Hayward, P., 1968, "The measurement of combat effectiveness", Operations Research, 16, No. 2, 314--323,
[2]
Won-suk Ou, Myungsin Chae and Daesung Yeum, 2010, "Influence Factors of Effectively Executing NCW by User's Point of View", Journal of Korean Society for Internet Information, 11, No. 2, 109--126.
[3]
Changbeom Choi and Tag Gon Kim, 2009, "NC2W: Measuring Network Connectivity Research in NCW Environment", Proceeding on Conference Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 378--381.
[4]
Ling, M. F., Moon T., and Kruzins E., 2005, "Proposed Network Centric Warfare Metric: From Connectivity to the OODA Cycle", Journal of the Military Operations Research Society, 10, No. 1, 5--14.
[5]
Perry, Walter L., and Fred DJ Bowden., 2003, "Advanced metrics for network-centric naval operations", AeroSense 2003, International Society for Optics and Photonics
[6]
Marshall, A. W., 1999, "Measuring the Effects of Network-Centric Warfare", Booz·Allen & Hamilton Inc. Washington DC, April.
[7]
Dekker, Anthony H., 2006, "Agility in networked military systems: A simulation experiment", 11th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium, Cambridge.
[8]
Seyoun Park, Hayong Shin, Taesik Lee, and Bongwan Choi, 2010, "Design of the Agent-based Network-Centric Warfare Modeling System", Journal of The Korea Society For Simulation, 19, No. 4, 210--280.
[9]
Janssen, René, and Herman Monsuur, 2010, "Networks, Information and Choice", Collective Decision Making, 211--230
[10]
Chi-Young Jung and Jae-Yeong Lee, 2011, "A Proposal of Combat Power Measurement Model of Army Warfare Information System Using Network Power based on Social Network Analysis", Journal of Korean Academic Society of Business Administration, 36, No. 2, 1--16.
[11]
Cares, Jeffrey R., 2004, "An information age combat model." Technical Report, Alidade Incorporated, produced for the Director, Net Assessment, Office of the Secretary of Defense under Contract TPD-01-C-0023.
[12]
Carley, Kathleen M., 2003, "Dynamic network analysis" Dynamic social network modeling and analysis: Workshop summary and papers, Comittee on Human Factors, National Research Council, 133--145.
[13]
Moon, Il-Chul, and Kathleen M. Carley, 2007, "Modeling and simulating terrorist networks in social and geospatial dimensions" Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 22, No. 5, 40--49.
[14]
Moon, Il-Chul, Eunice J. Kim, and Kathleen M. Carley, 2008, Automated Influence Network Generation and the Node Parameter Sensitivity Analysis, CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIV PITTSBURGH PA.
[15]
Darilek, Richard E., 2001, Measures of effectiveness for the information-age army, 1155, Rand Corporation.
[16]
Milo, R., Shen-Orr, S. S., Itzkovitz, S., Kashtan, N., and Alon, U., 2002, Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 298, 824--827.
[17]
Beck, Justin, et al. 2003, Knowledge Superiority Parameter-a Metric for Network Centric Warfare (NCW), Defense Technical Information Center.
[18]
Perry, Walter L., and J. Moffat., 2010, "Measuring the effects of knowledge in military campaigns", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48, No. 10, 965--972.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SCSC '13: Proceedings of the 2013 Summer Computer Simulation Conference
July 2013
419 pages
ISBN:9781627482769

Sponsors

  • SCS: Society for Modeling and Simulation International

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Society for Modeling & Simulation International

Vista, CA

Publication History

Published: 07 July 2013

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. C4ISR
  2. combat effectiveness
  3. meta-matrix
  4. network centric warfare (NCW)
  5. network model

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

SummerSim '13
Sponsor:
  • SCS
SummerSim '13: 2013 Summer Simulation Multiconference
July 7 - 10, 2013
Ontario, Toronto, Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 189
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media