Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/2431518.2431895acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A case for virtualization of content delivery networks

Published: 11 December 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Content Delivery Networks have gained a popular role among application service providers (ASPs) and infrastructural companies. A CDN is an overlay network that gives more control of asset delivery by strategically placing servers closer to the end-user, reducing response time and network congestion. Many strategies have been proposed to deal with aspects inherent to the CDN distribution model. Though mostly very effective, a traditional CDN approach of statically positioned elements often fails to meet quality of experience (QoE) requirements when network conditions suddenly change. In this paper, we introduce the idea of CDN virtualization. The goal is to allow programmatically modification in CDN infrastructure designed for video distribution, adapting it to new operating conditions. We developed a complete simulator focused on CDN overlay network characteristics where we implemented several approaches for each of the CDN elements. Our results show a decrease of 20% in startup delay and network usage.

References

[1]
Anderson, T., L. Peterson, S. Shenker and J. Turner. 2005. "Overcoming the Internet impasse through virtualization," Computer.
[2]
Busari, M. and C. Williamson. 2002. "Prowgen: A synthetic workload generation tool for simulation evaluation of web proxy caches," Computer Networks, vol. 38, pp. 779--794.
[3]
Buyya, R., A.-M. K. Pathan, J. Broberg and Z. Tari. 2006. "A Case for Peering of Content Delivery Networks," IEEE Distributed Systems Online, 7 (10).
[4]
Carapinha, J. and J. Jiménez. 2009. "Network virtualization: a view from the bottom." In Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Virtualized infrastructure systems and architectures.
[5]
Chenyu, P., A. Merdan, B.H. Mohammad, S. Toshihiko and Y. Norihiko. 2006. "FCAN: Flash Crowds Alleviation Network Using Adaptive P2P Overlay of Cache Proxies," IEICE Trans. Commun.
[6]
Feamster, N., L. Gao and J. Rexford. 2007. "How to Lease the Internet in Your Spare Time," ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review.
[7]
Freedman, M. J., E. Freudenthal and D. Mazières. 2004. "Democratizing Content Publication with Coral." In Proceedings of 1st USENIX/ACM Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, San Francisco, CA, March 2004.
[8]
Gilbert, D. and T. Morgner. JFreeChart. Available at: http://www.jfree.org/jfreechart/index.html
[9]
Jamin, S., C. Jin, Y. Jin, D. Raz, Y. Shavitt, and L. Zhang. 2000. "On the placement of Internet instrumentation." In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, Tel-Aviv, Israel, pp. 295--304.
[10]
Jamin, S., C. Jin, A.R. Kure, D. Raz and Y. Shavitt. 2001. "Constrained Mirror Placement on the Internet." In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
[11]
Khan, A. and R. Buyya. 2007. A Taxonomy and Survey of Content Delivery Networks, Technical Report, Australia.
[12]
Krishnan, P., D. Raz and Y. Shavitt. 2000. "The Cache Location Problem," IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking, 8 (5).
[13]
Lechler, T. and B. Page. 1999. "DESMO-J: An Object Oriented Discrete Simulation Framework in Java". In Proceedings of the 11th European Simulation Symposium., pp. 46--50.
[14]
Li, B., M.J. Golin, G.F. Italiano, D. Xin and K. Sohraby. 1999. "On the Optimal Placement of Web Proxies in the Internet," In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, NY, USA, pp. 1282--1290.
[15]
Lyer, S., A. Rowstron and P. Druschel. 2002. "Squirrel: A decentralized peer-to-peer web cache," In Proc. 21th ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing.
[16]
Padmanabhan, V.N. and K. Sripanidkulchai. 2002. "The case for cooperative networking." In Proc. 1st International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems, pp.178--190, Cambridge, MA, USA.
[17]
Plagemann, T., V. Goebel, A. Mauthe, L. Mathy, T. Turletti and G. Urvoy-Keller. 2006. "From content distribution networks to content networks - issues and challenges," Computer Communications, 29(5).
[18]
Qiu, L., V.N. Padmanabhan and G.M. Voelker. 2001. "On the Placement of Web Server Replicas." In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, pp. 1587--1596.
[19]
Sidiropoulos, A., G. Pallis, D. Katsaros, K. Stamos, A. Vakali and Y. Manolopoulos. 2008. "Prefetching in content distribution networks via Web communities identification and outsourcing." World Wide Web Journal, 11(1):39--70.
[20]
Stavrou, A., D. Rubenstein and S. Sahu. 2004. "A lightweight, robust P2P system to handle flash crowds," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 22(1), pp.6--17.
[21]
Völker, L., D. Martin, I. El Khayaty, C. Werle and M. Zitterbart. 2009. "A Node Architecture for 1000 Future Networks," Workshop of the IEEE International Conference on Communications.
[22]
Wang, L., K.S. Park, R. Pang, V.S. Pai and L. Peterson. 2004. "Reliability and Security in CoDeeN Content Distribution Network." In Proceedings of the USENIX 2004 Annual Technical Conference, Boston, MA, USA.
[23]
Zhu, Y., R. Zhang-Shen, S. Rangarajan and J. Rexford. 2008. "Cabernet: connectivity architecture for better network services." In Proceedings of the ACM CoNEXT Conference.

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Challenges of future multimedia QoE monitoring for internet service providersMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-017-4870-z76:21(22243-22266)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
  • (2013)Optimizing cross traffic with an adaptive CDN replica placement strategyProceedings of the 46th Annual Simulation Symposium10.5555/2499604.2499618(1-8)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2013
  • (2013)On learning how to plan content delivery networksProceedings of the 46th Annual Simulation Symposium10.5555/2499604.2499617(1-8)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2013

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSC '11: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference
December 2011
4336 pages

Sponsors

Publisher

Winter Simulation Conference

Publication History

Published: 11 December 2011

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WSC'11
Sponsor:
WSC'11: Winter Simulation Conference 2011
December 11 - 14, 2011
Arizona, Phoenix

Acceptance Rates

WSC '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 203 of 270 submissions, 75%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 16 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2017)Challenges of future multimedia QoE monitoring for internet service providersMultimedia Tools and Applications10.1007/s11042-017-4870-z76:21(22243-22266)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2017
  • (2013)Optimizing cross traffic with an adaptive CDN replica placement strategyProceedings of the 46th Annual Simulation Symposium10.5555/2499604.2499618(1-8)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2013
  • (2013)On learning how to plan content delivery networksProceedings of the 46th Annual Simulation Symposium10.5555/2499604.2499617(1-8)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2013

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media