Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/2431518.2431710acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Evaluating variance reduction techniques within a sample average approximation method for a constrained inventory policy optimization problem

Published: 11 December 2011 Publication History

Abstract

This paper examines a constrained stochastic inventory optimization problem by means of sample average approximations (SAA). The problem is formulated based on the lead time demand parameters. Lead time demands are sampled by a bootstrap method that is performed by randomly generating demand values over deterministic lead time values. In order to increase the efficiency of solving an SAA replication, a number of variance reduction techniques (VRT) are proposed, namely: antithetic variates, common random numbers and Latin hypercube sampling methods. A set of experiments investigates the quality of these VRTs on the estimated optimality gap and gap variance results for different demand processes. The results indicate that the use of VRTs produces significant improvements over the crude Monte Carlo sampling method on all test cases.

References

[1]
Agrawal, V., and S. Seshadri. 2000. "Distribution free bounds for service constrained (r, q) inventory systems". Naval Research Logistics 47:635--656.
[2]
Ahmed, S., and A. Shapiro. 2002. "The Sample Average Approximation Method for Stochastic Programs with Integer Recourse". Technical report, Georgia Institute of Technology.
[3]
Axsäter, S. 2006. Inventory Control. Springer, New York.
[4]
Federgruen, A., and Y. S. Zheng. 1992. "An Efficient Algorithm for Computing an Optimal (r, Q) Policy in Continuous Review Stochastic Inventory Systems". Operations Research 40:808--813.
[5]
Freimer, M. B., D. J. Thomas, and T. Linderoth. 2010. "The impact of sampling methods on bias and variance in stochastic linear programs". Computational Optimization and Applications 46:1--25.
[6]
Greenwald, A., B. Guillemette, V. Naroditskiy, and M. Tschantz. 2006. "Scaling Up the Sample Average Approximation Method for Stochastic Optimization with Applications to Trading Agents". Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3937:187--199.
[7]
Hsu, J. C. 1981. "Simultaneous confidence intervals for all distances from the "best"". Annals of Statistics 9:1026--1034.
[8]
Kleywegt, A. J., and A. Shapiro. 2001. "The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization". SIAM Journal on Optimization:502.
[9]
Kramer, C. Y. 1956. "Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal number of replications". Biometrics 12:307--310.
[10]
Law, A. M., and D. M. Kelton. 1999. Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[11]
Linderoth, J., A. Shapiro, and S. Wright. 2006, February. "The empirical behavior of sampling methods for stochastic programming". Annals of Operations Research 142 (1): 215--241.
[12]
Mak, W.-K., D. P. Morton, and R. K. Wood. 1999. "Monte Carlo bounding techniques for determining solution quality in stochastic programs". Operations Research Letters 24 (1-2): 47--56.
[13]
Matala, A. 2008. "Sample Size Requierement for Monte Carlo -- simulations using Latin Hypercube Sampling". Technical report, Helsinki University of Technology, Department of Engineering Physics and Mathematics.
[14]
Rossetti, M., and Y. Ünlü. 2011. "Evaluating the Robustness of Lead Time Demand Models". The International Journal of Production Economics 134:159--176.
[15]
Tukey, J. W. 1953. The Collected Works of John W. Tukey VIII. Multiple Comparisons: 1948--1983. Chapman & Hall, New York.
[16]
Zipkin, P. 2000. Foundations of Inventory Management. McGraw-Hill, New York.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSC '11: Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference
December 2011
4336 pages

Sponsors

Publisher

Winter Simulation Conference

Publication History

Published: 11 December 2011

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WSC'11
Sponsor:
WSC'11: Winter Simulation Conference 2011
December 11 - 14, 2011
Arizona, Phoenix

Acceptance Rates

WSC '11 Paper Acceptance Rate 203 of 270 submissions, 75%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 45
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media