Students' motivations and their contributions to virtual learning
Authors: 
Bart Rienties, Dirk Tempelaar, Piet Van Den Bossche, Wim Gijselaers, Mien SegersAuthors Info & Claims
Pages 254 - 261
Abstract
In recent years, increasing attention has been devoted to virtual learning. Individual characteristics are known to play a crucial role in learning processes but only limited research has been conducted in the context of virtual settings. Therefore, we used an integrated multimethod approach in order to examine the impact of types of academic motivation (intrinsic vs. extrinsic) on virtual learning. This study of 100 online summer course participants indicates that the willingness to contribute to discourse depends on the type of motivation. Intrinsically motivated learners became central and prominent contributors to cognitive discourse. In contrast, extrinsically motivated learners contributed less and were positioned on the outer fringe of the social network.
References
[1]
Aviv, R., Erlich, Z., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. JALN, 7(3), 1-23.
[2]
Bromme, R., Hesse, F. W., & Spada, H. (Eds.). (2005). Barriers and Biases in Computer-Mediated knowledge communication and how they may be overcome (5 ed.). New York: Springer.
[3]
Burt, R. S., Jannotta, J. E., & Mahoney, J. T. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 20(1), 63-87.
[4]
De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R.-J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher. Instructional Science, 35(3), 257-286.
[5]
De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6-28.
[6]
Freeman, L. (2000). Visualizing Social Networks. Journal of Social Structure, 1(1).
[7]
Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
[8]
Jehn, K. A., & Shah, P. P. (1997). Interpersonal relationships and task performance: An examination of mediation processes in friendship and acquaintance groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(4), 775-790.
[9]
Jeong, A. C. (2003). The Sequential Analysis of Group Interaction and Critical Thinking in Online Threaded discussions. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25-43.
[10]
Jonassen, D., H., & Kwon, H. (2001). Communication patterns in computer mediated versus face-to-face group problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, V49(1), 35-51.
[11]
Kirschner, P., Strijbos, J.-W., Kreijns, K., & Beers, P. (2004). Designing electronic collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 47-66.
[12]
Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why Do High School Students Lack Motivation in the Classroom? Toward an Understanding of Academic Amotivation and the Role of Social Support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567-582.
[13]
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Pihlajamäki, H., & Kotkas, T. (2003). What Makes a Student Group Successful? Student-Student and Student-Teacher Interaction in a Problem-Based Learning Environment. Learning Environments Research, 6(1), 59-76.
[14]
Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 537-548.
[15]
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 5-18.
[16]
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8-22.
[17]
Russo, T. C., & Koesten, J. (2005). Prestige, Centrality, and Learning: A Social Network Analysis of an Online Class. Communication Education, 54(3), 254-261.
[18]
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
[19]
Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2005). Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 957-975.
[20]
Strijbos, J.-W., & Stahl, G. (2007). Methodological issues in developing a multi-dimensional coding procedure for small-group chat communication. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 394-404.
[21]
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallièères, E. F. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1017.
[22]
Veerman, A. L., & Veldhuis-Diermanse, E. (2001). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning: proceedings of the 1st European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 625-632). Maastricht: University of Maastricht.
[23]
Wassermann, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press.
[24]
Williams, E. A., Duray, R., & Reddy, V. (2006). Teamwork Orientation, Group Cohesiveness, and Student Learning: A Study of the Use of Teams in Online Distance Education. Journal of Management Education, 30(4), 592.
Index Terms
- Students' motivations and their contributions to virtual learning
Recommendations
Chinese Students’ Motivations to Adopt E-Learning
Innovative Technologies and LearningAbstractCulture influences how students give meanings to, and engage with, e-learning. Since the predominance of research draws on models construed with values from the Western world they risk lacking congruence with other contexts. This study aims to ...
Understanding ESL Students' Motivations to Increase MOOC Accessibility
L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ ScaleMassive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have the potential to bridge education and literacy gaps by offering high quality, free courses to anyone with an Internet connection. MOOCs in their present state, however, may be relatively inaccessible to non-...
The effect of virtual learning environments designed according to problem-based learning approach to students’ success, problem-solving skills, and motivations
AbstractThe goal of this research is to present the effects of virtual learning environments, specifically designed according to the problem-based learning approach (PBL) for 7th-grade students’ science lessons. The effects of these specific environments ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
June 2008
523 pages
Publisher
International Society of the Learning Sciences
Publication History
Published: 24 June 2008
Qualifiers
- Article
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 158Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)0
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 20 Nov 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in