Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/1599812.1599865dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiclsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Rethinking pedagogy: using multi-user virtual environments to foster authentic science learning

Published: 24 June 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Science as it is portrayed in the typical K-12 classroom bears little resemblance to science as practiced by scientists, relying heavily on presentational pedagogies. To counter this, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the National Research Council, and the National Science Teachers Association have all called for a stronger emphasis on having students perform scientific inquiry in the classroom. Yet this has proven challenging to do. How can schools replicate authentic science experiences in the classroom? This paper reports on the benefits of using Multi-user Virtual Environments to create authentic science experiences for middle-school students that allow them to engage in the processes of scientists. Our research indicates that low self-efficacy students and those with poor initial knowledge do as well as those with average self-efficacy and better than those learning with more traditional inquiry pedagogies. High self-efficacy students, however, do better with the traditional inquiry methods.

References

[1]
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
[2]
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
[3]
Annetta, L. & Park, J.C. (2006). Video Games in Science: A Model for Students and Teachers Creating 3D Role Playing Games. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, Orlando, FL.
[4]
Barab, S., Arici, A., & Jackson, C. (2005). Eat your vegetables and do your homework: a design based investigation of enjoyment and meaning in learning. Educational Technology, 45(1), 15-20.
[5]
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
[6]
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2001). Epistemologically authentic scientific reasoning. In K. Crowley, C. D. Schunn, & T. Okada (Eds.), Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (pp. 351-392). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[7]
Clarke, J. (2006). Making Learning Meaningful: An Exploratory Study of Using MUVEs to teach Middle School Science. Unpublished Qualifying Paper presented to the Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, MA.
[8]
Clarke, J., Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., & Nelson, B. (2006). A design-based research strategy to promote scalability for educational innovations. Educational Technology, 46 (3), 27-36.
[9]
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century: An Agenda for American Science and Technology, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (2007). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[10]
Corbit, Margaret, S. Kolodziej, R. Bernstein and C. McIntyre. (May 2006) Student Project Virtual Worlds as Windows on Scientific Cultures in Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Public Communication of Science and Technology, Seoul, Korea.
[11]
Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong question. Educational Research, 26(1), 5-17.
[12]
Grigg, W., Lauko, M., and Brockway, D. (2006). The Nation's Report Card: Science 2005 (NCES 2006-466). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[13]
Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36-40.
[14]
Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). The Impact of Student Self-Efficacy on Scientific Inquiry Skills: An Exploratory Investigation in River City, a Multi-User Virtual Environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(1), 99-111.
[15]
Ketelhut, D. J. (2005, April 4-8). Assessing Scientific and Technological Self-efficacy: A Measurement Pilot. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas.
[16]
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., et al. (2004). Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 1063-1080.
[17]
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards: observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[18]
National Science Foundation. (2001). Characteristics of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers in the United States, 2001, {internet}. National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/nsf03310/pdf/tab6.pdf {2004, March 19}.
[19]
Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D. J. (2007). Designing for Real-World Inquiry in Virtual Environments. Educational Psychology Review 19(3), p. 265-283.
[20]
Pajares, F. (2000). Schooling in America: Myths, mixed messages, and good intentions (Lecture): Emory University, Cannon Chapel.
[21]
Panel Urges Shift of Focus for School Science Courses. (1995, December 7). New York Times.
[22]
Piaget, J. (1930). The child's conception of physical causality. London: K. Paul, Trench, & Trubner.
[23]
The National Academies. (2005). U.S. High School Science Lab Experiences Often Poor, But Research Points Way to Improvements. Available: http://www4.nationalacademies.org/ news.nsf/isbn/0309096715?OpenDocument {2005, August}.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ICLS'08: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 1
June 2008
484 pages

Publisher

International Society of the Learning Sciences

Publication History

Published: 24 June 2008

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 307 of 307 submissions, 100%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 71
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 23 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media