Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.5555/1516744.1516978acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswscConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Randomized methods for solving the winner determination problem in combinatorial auctions

Published: 07 December 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Combinatorial auctions, where buyers can bid on bundles of items rather than bidding them sequentially, often lead to more economically efficient allocations of financial resources. However, the problem of determining the winners once the bids are submitted, the so-called Winner Determination Problem (WDP), is known to be NP hard. We present two randomized algorithms to solve this combinatorial optimization problem. The first is based on the Cross-Entropy (CE) method, a versatile adaptive algorithm that has been successfully applied to solve various well-known difficult combinatorial optimization problems. The other is a new adaptive simulation approach by Botev and Kroese, which evolved from the CE method and combines the adaptiveness and level-crossing ideas of CE with Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. The performance of the proposed algorithms are illustrated by various examples.

References

[1]
Botev, Z. I., and D. P. Kroese. 2008. An efficient algorithm for rare-event probability estimation, combinatorial optimization, and counting. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability 10(4). To appear.
[2]
Brewer, P. J. 1999. Decentralized computation procurement and computational robustness in a smart market. Economic Theory 13:41--92.
[3]
Cramton, P. 1998. The efficiency of the fcc spectrum auctions. Journal of Law and Economics 41:727--736.
[4]
Cramton, P., Y. Shoham, and R. Steinberg. 2006. Combinatorial auctions. The MIT Press.
[5]
de Vries, S., and R. Vohra. 2003. Combinatorial auctions: A survey. INFORMS Journal on Computing 15(3).
[6]
Jackson, C. 1976. Technology for spectrum markets. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering, MIT.
[7]
Narahari, Y., and P. Dayama. 2005. Combinatorial auctions for electronic business. Sadhana Special Issue on Electronic Commerce 30:179--211.
[8]
Nisan, N. 2000. Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions. In ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, 1--12.
[9]
Rassenti, S. J., V. L. Smith, and R. L. Bulfin. 1982. A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. The Bell Journal of Economics 13:402--417.
[10]
Rubinstein, R. Y., and D. P. Kroese. 2004. The cross-entropy method: A unified approach to combinatorial optimization monte-carlo simulation, and machine learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.
[11]
Sandholm, T., S. Suri, A. Gilpin, and D. Levine. 2005. Cabob: A fast optimal algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Management Science 51:374--390.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WSC '08: Proceedings of the 40th Conference on Winter Simulation
December 2008
3189 pages
ISBN:9781424427086

Sponsors

  • IIE: Institute of Industrial Engineers
  • INFORMS-SIM: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences: Simulation Society
  • ASA: American Statistical Association
  • IEEE/SMC: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
  • SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
  • NIST: National Institute of Standards and Technology
  • (SCS): The Society for Modeling and Simulation International

Publisher

Winter Simulation Conference

Publication History

Published: 07 December 2008

Check for updates

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

WSC08
Sponsor:
  • IIE
  • INFORMS-SIM
  • ASA
  • IEEE/SMC
  • SIGSIM
  • NIST
  • (SCS)
WSC08: Winter Simulation Conference
December 7 - 10, 2008
Florida, Miami

Acceptance Rates

WSC '08 Paper Acceptance Rate 249 of 304 submissions, 82%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 3,413 of 5,075 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 77
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 24 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Get Access

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media