Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

skip to main content
10.1145/1378533.1378540acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspaaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

What can be approximated locally?: case study: dominating sets in planar graphs

Published: 14 June 2008 Publication History

Abstract

Whether local algorithms can compute constant approximations of NP-hard problems is of both practical and theoretical interest. So far, no algorithms achieving this goal are known, as either the approximation ratio or the running time exceed O(1), or the nodes are provided with non-trivial additional information. In this paper, we present the first distributed algorithm approximating a minimum dominating set on a planar graph within a constant factor in constant time. Moreover, the nodes do not need any additional information.

References

[1]
N. Alon, L. Babai, and A. Itai. A fast and simple randomized parallel algorithm for the maximal independent set problem. Journal of Algorithms, 7(4):567--583, 1986.
[2]
B. N. Clark, C. J. Colbourn, and D. S. Johnson. Unit disk graphs. Discrete Math., 86(1-3):165--177, 1990.
[3]
R. Cole and U. Vishkin. Deterministic Coin Tossing with Applications to Optimal Parallel List Ranking. Information and Control, 70(1):32--53, 1986.
[4]
A. Czygrinow, M. Hanckowiak, and E. Szymanska. Distributed Approximation Algorithms for Planar Graphs. In Proceedings of the 6th Italian Conference on Algorithms and Complexity (CIAC), 2006.
[5]
P. Floréen, P. Kaski, T. Musto, and J. Suomela. Local Approximation Algorithms for Scheduling Problems in Sensor Networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Wireless Sensor Networks (Algosensors), 2007.
[6]
P. Floréen, P. Kaski, and J. Suomela. A distributed approximation scheme for sleep scheduling in sensor networks. In Proc. 4th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON, San Diego, CA, USA, June 2007), pages 152--161, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2007. IEEE.
[7]
P. Fraigniaud, C. Gavoille, D. Ilcinkas, and A. Pelc. Distributed computing with advice: Information sensitivity of graph coloring. In 34th International Colloquium onAutomata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), pages 231--242, 2007.
[8]
P. Fraigniaud, D. Ilcinkas, and A. Pelc. Oracle size: a new measure of difficulty for communication tasks. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing (PODC), pages 179--187, 2006.
[9]
P. Fraigniaud, A. Korman, and E. Lebhar. Local mst computation with short advice. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on Parallel algorithms and architectures (SPAA), pages 154--160, 2007.
[10]
M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. Freeman, New York, 1979.
[11]
B. Gfeller and E. Vicari. A Randomized Distributed Algorithm for the Maximal Independent Set Problem in Growth-Bounded Graphs. In Proc. 26th annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing (PODC), 2007.
[12]
A. Israel and A. Itai. A fast and simple randomized parallel algorithm for maximal matching. Information Processing Letters, 22(2):77--80, 1986.
[13]
L. Jia, R. Rajaraman, and T. Suel. An Efficient Distributed Algorithm for Constructing Small Dominating Sets. Distributed Computing, 15(4):193--205, 2002.
[14]
F. Kuhn, T. Moscibroda, T. Nieberg, and R. Wattenhofer. Fast Deterministic Distributed Maximal Independent Set Computation on Growth-Bounded Graphs. In Proc. 19th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC), 2005.
[15]
F. Kuhn, T. Moscibroda, and R. Wattenhofer. What Cannot Be Computed Locally! In Proc. 23rd annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing (PODC), 2004.
[16]
F. Kuhn, T. Moscibroda, and R. Wattenhofer. On the Locality of Bounded Growth. In Proc. 24th ACM Symposium on the Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2005.
[17]
F. Kuhn, T. Moscibroda, and R. Wattenhofer. The Price of Being Near-Sighted. In Proc. 17th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2006.
[18]
F. Kuhn and R. Wattenhofer. Constant-Time Distributed Dominating Set Approximation. In Proc. 22nd ACM Symposium on the Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2003.
[19]
N. Linial. Locality in Distributed Graph Algorithms. SIAM Journal on Computing, 21(1):193--201, 1992.
[20]
M. Luby. A Simple Parallel Algorithm for the Maximal Independent Set Problem. SIAM Journal on Computing, 15(4):1036--1055, 1986.
[21]
M. Naor and L. Stockmeyer. What Can Be Computed Locally? SIAM Journal on Computing, 24(6):1259--1277, 1995.
[22]
D. Peleg. Distributed Computing: A Locality-Sensitive Approach. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000.
[23]
J. Schneider and R. Wattenhofer. A Log-Star Distributed Maximal Independent Set Algorithm for Growth-Bounded Graphs. In 27th Annual ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, August 2008.
[24]
A. Wiese and E. Kranakis. Local PTAS for Independent Set and Vertex Cover in Location Aware Unit Disk Graphs. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS), June 2008.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Local certification of graphs with bounded genusDiscrete Applied Mathematics10.1016/j.dam.2022.10.004325(9-36)Online publication date: Jan-2023
  • (2023)Near-optimal distributed dominating set in bounded arboricity graphsDistributed Computing10.1007/s00446-023-00447-z37:4(387-398)Online publication date: 15-May-2023
  • (2022)Near-Optimal Distributed Dominating Set in Bounded Arboricity GraphsProceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3519270.3538437(292-300)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2022
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. What can be approximated locally?: case study: dominating sets in planar graphs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SPAA '08: Proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium on Parallelism in algorithms and architectures
      June 2008
      380 pages
      ISBN:9781595939739
      DOI:10.1145/1378533
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 14 June 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. approximation
      2. distributed algorithms
      3. dominating sets
      4. local algorithms
      5. planar graphs

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      SPAA08

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 447 of 1,461 submissions, 31%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)3
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 25 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Local certification of graphs with bounded genusDiscrete Applied Mathematics10.1016/j.dam.2022.10.004325(9-36)Online publication date: Jan-2023
      • (2023)Near-optimal distributed dominating set in bounded arboricity graphsDistributed Computing10.1007/s00446-023-00447-z37:4(387-398)Online publication date: 15-May-2023
      • (2022)Near-Optimal Distributed Dominating Set in Bounded Arboricity GraphsProceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3519270.3538437(292-300)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2022
      • (2022)Distributed backup placementDistributed Computing10.1007/s00446-022-00423-z35:5(455-473)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2022
      • (2021)Randomized Local Network Computing: Derandomization Beyond Locally Checkable LabelingsACM Transactions on Parallel Computing10.1145/34706408:4(1-25)Online publication date: 15-Oct-2021
      • (2021)Compact Distributed Certification of Planar GraphsAlgorithmica10.1007/s00453-021-00823-wOnline publication date: 6-May-2021
      • (2020)Compact Distributed Certification of Planar GraphsProceedings of the 39th Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing10.1145/3382734.3404505(319-328)Online publication date: 31-Jul-2020
      • (2020)A hierarchy of local decisionTheoretical Computer Science10.1016/j.tcs.2020.12.017Online publication date: Dec-2020
      • (2016)Local ComputationJournal of the ACM10.1145/274201263:2(1-44)Online publication date: 31-Mar-2016
      • (2016)Membrane Computing to Enhance Time Efficiency of Minimum Dominating SetMathematics in Computer Science10.1007/s11786-016-0261-510:2(249-261)Online publication date: 24-Mar-2016
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media