Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Quantification and Mitigation of Errors in the Inertial Measurements of Distance

  • Original paper
  • Published:
MAPAN Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The accurate measurement of the distance travelled, velocity and acceleration at low velocities to supersonic speeds is an active area of research. The captive flight at Rail Track Rocket Sled (RTRS) facility provides a unique environment for kinematic testing at supersonic speeds. Using RTRS facility, an accurate distance measurement method is developed, tested and experimentally verified. Three accelerometers, with different noise density, identically moving, have been chosen for sensing forward motion. A number of measures such as different mountings, bias correction, capping, digital filtering and position fix have been tried in a practical implementation. To keep the measurement error within tolerable limits a novel method of obtaining position fix is proposed by using a pair of magneto-inductive sensors. The bias correction is applied in the position to derive corrected velocity and acceleration. To know the truthfulness of results and to validate the proposed methods, a system has been developed to generate reference values for computation of error. This reference system has an error of 0.046 % which is much better than reported in previous study. After mitigation of various errors using proposed methods, an error within 1.5 % was attained with one of the sensors used in trials. The proposed work identifies the elements which contribute in errors and quantify the mitigated errors in some cases and highlights the measures which bring about significant improvement in error. It also suggests how to obtain more accurate results using economical MEMS accelerometers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. J. Jerosch and J. Heisel, Management der Arthrose: Innovative Therapiekonzepte (in German), Deutscher Ärzteverlag. ISBN 978-3-7691-0599-5, Retrieved (2011) 107.

  2. Y.K. Thong, M.S. Woolfson, J.A. Crowe, B.R. Hayes-Gill and R.E. Challis, Dependence of inertial measurements of distance on accelerometer noise, Meas. Sci. Technol., 13 (2002) 1163–1172.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Y.K. Thong, M.S. Woolfson, J.A. Crowe, B.R. Hayes-Gill and D.A. Jones, Numerical double integration of acceleration measurements in noise, Measurement, 36 (2004) 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. L. Hoff, O.J. Elle , M. Grimnes, S. Halvorsen, H.J. Alker and E. Fosse, Measurements of heart motion using accelerometers, IEEE Proc. Sensors, 3 (October 2004) 1353–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Nikbakht, M. Mazlom and A. Khayatian, Evaluation of solid state accelerometer sensor for position estimation, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Hong Kong (2005) pp. 729–723.

  6. C. Verplaetse, Inertial proprioceptive devices, self-motion sensing toys and tools, IBM Syst. J., 35 (3&4) (1996) 639–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Hirao, S. Kunimatsu and T. Hamamoto, Wireless measurement system for ground-borne vibration and vibration amplifications in buildings, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc India, 27 (4) (2012) 231–239.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.W. Tan and S. Park, Design of accelerometer-based inertial navigation systems, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 54 (6) (2005) 2520–2530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Neto, J.N. Pires and A.P. Moreira, 3-D position estimation from inertial sensing: minimizing the error from the process of double integration of accelerations, Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON Vienna, Austria (2013) pp. 4024–4029.

  10. G.A. Aydemir and A. Saranli, Characterization and calibration of MEMS inertial sensors for state and parameter estimation applications, Meas. J., 45 (5) (2012) 1210–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Liu and G. Pang, Evaluation of a low cost solid-state accelerometer as a distance measuring sensor for vehicle positioning system, IEEE Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Tokyo (1999) pp. 435–439.

  12. K.N. Suryanarayana Rao, GAGAN—The Indian satellite based augmentation system, Indian J. Radio Space Phys., 36 (2007) 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Indian Space Projects, http://isp.justthe80.com/space-applications/gagan, January 2014.

  14. News Paper “The Hindu”, GAGAN will be put in place by end of 2014: Defence Secretary, Statement of Defence Secretary and Director General DRDO, 14 Dec (2013).

  15. T.H. Whitte and A.M. Wilson, Accuracy of WAAS-enabled GPS for the determination of position and speed over ground, J. Biomech., 38 (8) (2005) 1717–1722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P.K. Khosla, R. Khanna and S.P. Sood, Analysis of magneto-inductive system for rocket sled velocity measurement beyond mach 1.5, Def. Sci. J., 64 (2) (2014) 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. V.N. Ojha, K. Sudhir, S.K. Sharma, S. Singhal and G.S. Lamba, Insulation resistance measurement of high impedance accelerometer cables, MAPAN-J. Metrol. Soc. India, 19 (1–2) (2004) 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. K. Khosla.

Appendix A

Appendix A

The derivation of the equation given below is given in [3]. The details are given here so as to build on what has been done earlier, elaborate it, apply it to a new application and act as ready reference. The expectation value of the square error in position (E Ssq) at Nth sample can be determined for each sample when N = 1, 2, 3, … and so on, i.e., for calculation of 100th sample N = 100 and all the samples from 1 to 100 are considered while finding self correlation.

$$ E_{{{\text{Ssq}}}} (N) = r\left[ 0 \right]\frac{{t_{{\text{s}}}^{4} }}{{12}}\left( {N - 1} \right)\left( {N^{2} - 2N + 3} \right) + A\frac{{t_{{\text{s}}}^{4} }}{3}S_{3} - A\frac{{t_{{\text{s}}}^{4} }}{6}\left( {3N^{2} - 6N + 5} \right)S_{1} + A\frac{{t_{{\text{s}}}^{4} }}{6}\left( {N - 1} \right)\left( {N^{2} - 2N + 3} \right)S_{0} - A\frac{{t_{{\text{s}}}^{4} }}{8}\left( {N - 1} \right)^{2} e^{{ - B\left( {N - 1} \right)}} - A\frac{{t_{{\text{s}}}^{4} }}{8}\left( {N - 1} \right)^{2} $$
(12)

where sample time t s = 1/f s and r[0] represents self correlation function with zero lag

$$ r[0] = \frac{1}{N} \times \sum \limits_{{i\; = \;1}}^{N} a\left( i \right) \times a(i) $$
(13)

and the values of constants A and B are calculated as follows

$$ A = \frac{{\pi f_{\text{c}} \sigma_{\text{c}}^{2} }}{2},\quad B = \frac{{2\pi f_{\text{c}} }}{{f_{\text{s}} }}. $$

Here, f c (1 kHz) is the cut off frequency of the anti-aliasing filter and f s (2 kHz) is the rate at which the accelerometer output is sampled. The values of constants S 3, S 1, S 0 are calculated as follows

$$ S_{3} = \frac{f}{g} $$
$$ S_{1} = \frac{{{\text{e}}^{{ - B}} - {\text{e}}^{{ - B\left( {1 + M} \right)}} - M{\text{e}}^{{ - B\left( {1 + M} \right)}} + M{\text{e}}^{{ - B\left( {2 + M} \right)}} }}{{\left( {{\text{e}}^{{ - B}} - 1} \right)^{2} }} $$
(14)

where

$$ M = N - 2, \quad g = \left( {{\text{e}}^{{ - B}} - 1} \right)^{4} $$
(15)
$$ f = {\text{e}}^{ - B} + {\text{e}}^{ - 3B} {-}3M^{2} {\text{e}}^{ - B(1 + M)} + 6M^{2} {\text{e}}^{ - B(2 + M)} {-}{\text{e}}^{ - B(3 + M)} {-}3M^{2} {\text{e}}^{ - B(3 + M)} + 3M^{3} {\text{e}}^{ - B(2 + M)} {-}3M^{3} {\text{e}}^{ - B(3 + M)} + 3M{\text{e}}^{ - B(3 + M)} + M^{3} {\text{e}}^{ - B(4 + M)} {-} {\text{e}}^{ - B(1 + M)} {-}M^{3} {\text{e}}^{ - B(1 + M)} {-} 3M{\text{e}}^{ - B(1 + M)} + 4{\text{e}}^{ - 2B} {-} 4{\text{e}}^{ - B(2 + M)} $$
$$ E_{\text{rms}} \left( N \right) = {\sqrt{E_{\text{Ssq}}} (N)} $$
(16)

The RMS error at every sample can be calculated by:

$$ E_{\text{rms}} \left( N \right) = \sqrt {{{E}}_{\text{Ssq}} (N)} $$
(17)

The values at travel time of 4.2 s are given in Table 3.

Table 3 Typical values for accelerometer A2, t = 4.2 s, σ c = 0.0014 × 9.806 and N = 8400

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khosla, P.K., Khanna, R. & Sood, S.P. Quantification and Mitigation of Errors in the Inertial Measurements of Distance. MAPAN 30, 49–57 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-014-0115-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-014-0115-z

Keywords

Navigation