MFV reductions of MSSM parameter space

1. D. Adams, The Hitchhiker’s guide to the galaxy, Del Rey Publishing, U.K. (1995).

   Google Scholar 

2. S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, Adv. Ser. Direct. High Energy Phys. 21 (2010) 1 [hep-ph/9709356] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

3. D.J.H. Chung et al., The soft supersymmetry breaking lagrangian: theory and applications, Phys. Rept. 407 (2005) 1 [hep-ph/0312378] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

4. P. Nath et al., The hunt for new physics at the Large Hadron Collider, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 200-202 (2010) 185 [arXiv:1001.2693] [INSPIRE].

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. C.P. Burgess, J. Matias and F. Quevedo, MSLED: a minimal supersymmetric large extra dimensions scenario, Nucl. Phys. B 706 (2005) 71 [hep-ph/0404135] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

6. G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rept. 322 (1999) 419 [hep-ph/9801271] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

7. L.E. Ibanez and A.M. Uranga, String theory and particle physics: an introduction to string phenomenology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2012).

   Google Scholar 

8. LHC New Physics Working Group collaboration, D. Alves et al., Simplified models for LHC new physics searches, J. Phys. G 39 (2012) 105005 [arXiv:1105.2838] [INSPIRE].

   ADS  Google Scholar 

9. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, A solution to the supersymmetric fine-tuning problem within the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 58 [hep-ph/0509039] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

10. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, Supersymmetry, naturalness and signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 095004 [hep-ph/0602096] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

11. M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY endures, JHEP 09 (2012) 035 [arXiv:1110.6926] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

12. A. Djouadi, J.-L. Kneur and G. Moultaka, SuSpect: a Fortran code for the supersymmetric and Higgs particle spectrum in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 426 [hep-ph/0211331] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

13. R.S. Chivukula and H. Georgi, Composite technicolor standard model, Phys. Lett. B 188 (1987) 99 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

14. A.J. Buras, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, S. Jager and L. Silvestrini, Universal unitarity triangle and physics beyond the standard model, Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 161 [hep-ph/0007085] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

15. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: an effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

16. A.J. Buras, Minimal flavor violation, Acta Phys. Polon. B 34 (2003) 5615 [hep-ph/0310208] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

17. L.J. Hall and L. Randall, Weak scale effective supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 2939 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

18. M. Ciuchini, G. Degrassi, P. Gambino and G.F. Giudice, Next-to-leading QCD corrections to B → X _s γ in supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 534 (1998) 3 [hep-ph/9806308] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

19. A. Ali and D. London, Profiles of the unitarity triangle and CP-violating phases in the standard model and supersymmetric theories, Eur. Phys. J. C 9 (1999) 687 [hep-ph/9903535] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

20. A.J. Buras and R. Fleischer, Bounds on the unitarity triangle, sin 2β and K → neutrino anti-neutrino decays in models with minimal flavor violation, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 115010 [hep-ph/0104238] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

21. C. Bobeth, T. Ewerth, F. Krüger and J. Urban, Enhancement of \( B\left({\overline{B}}_d\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right)/B\left({\overline{B}}_s\to {\mu}^{+}{\mu}^{-}\right) \) in the MSSM with minimal flavor violation and large tan β, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 074021 [hep-ph/0204225] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

22. A.J. Buras, Relations between ∆M (s, d) and \( B\left(s,\ d\right)\to \mu \overline{\mu} \) in models with minimal flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 115 [hep-ph/0303060] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

23. C. Bobeth et al., Upper bounds on rare K and B decays from minimal flavor violation, Nucl. Phys. B 726 (2005) 252 [hep-ph/0505110] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

24. V. Cirigliano, B. Grinstein, G. Isidori and M.B. Wise, Minimal flavor violation in the lepton sector, Nucl. Phys. B 728 (2005) 121 [hep-ph/0507001] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

25. K. Agashe, M. Papucci, G. Perez and D. Pirjol, Next to minimal flavor violation, hep-ph/0509117 [INSPIRE].

26. UTfit collaboration, M. Bona et al., The UTfit collaboration report on the status of the unitarity triangle beyond the standard model. I. Model-independent analysis and minimal flavor violation, JHEP 03 (2006) 080 [hep-ph/0509219] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

27. B. Grinstein, V. Cirigliano, G. Isidori and M.B. Wise, Grand unification and the principle of minimal flavor violation, Nucl. Phys. B 763 (2007) 35 [hep-ph/0608123] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

28. Y. Grossman, Y. Nir, J. Thaler, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, Probing minimal flavor violation at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 096006 [arXiv:0706.1845] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

29. A.L. Fitzpatrick, G. Perez and L. Randall, Flavor anarchy in a Randall-Sundrum model with 5D minimal flavor violation and a low Kaluza-Klein scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 171604 [arXiv:0710.1869] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

30. G. Hiller and Y. Nir, Measuring flavor mixing with minimal flavor violation at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2008) 046 [arXiv:0802.0916] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

31. P. Paradisi, M. Ratz, R. Schieren and C. Simonetto, Running minimal flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 668 (2008) 202 [arXiv:0805.3989] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

32. T. Hurth, G. Isidori, J.F. Kamenik and F. Mescia, Constraints on new physics in MFV models: a model-independent analysis of ΔF = 1 processes, Nucl. Phys. B 808 (2009) 326 [arXiv:0807.5039] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

33. A.L. Kagan, G. Perez, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, General minimal flavor violation, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 076002 [arXiv:0903.1794] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

34. C.P. Burgess, M. Trott and S. Zuberi, Light octet scalars, a heavy Higgs and minimal flavour violation, JHEP 09 (2009) 082 [arXiv:0907.2696] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

35. J.M. Arnold, M. Pospelov, M. Trott and M.B. Wise, Scalar representations and minimal flavor violation, JHEP 01 (2010) 073 [arXiv:0911.2225] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

36. J.M. Arnold, B. Fornal and M. Trott, Prospects and constraints for vector-like MFV matter at LHC, JHEP 08 (2010) 059 [arXiv:1005.2185] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

37. B. Batell and M. Pospelov, B _s mixing and electric dipole moments in MFV, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 054033 [arXiv:1006.2127] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

38. B. Batell, J. Pradler and M. Spannowsky, Dark matter from minimal flavor violation, JHEP 08 (2011) 038 [arXiv:1105.1781] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

39. M. Redi, Composite MFV and beyond, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2030 [arXiv:1203.4220] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

40. W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori and G.D. Kribs, A minimal flavor violating 2HDM at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115009 [arXiv:1210.2465] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

41. G. Krnjaic and D. Stolarski, Gauging the way to MFV, JHEP 04 (2013) 064 [arXiv:1212.4860] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

42. A. Ali and E. Lunghi, Extended minimal flavor violating MSSM and implications for B physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 21 (2001) 683 [hep-ph/0105200] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

43. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, F. Merz and S. Penaranda, Electroweak precision observables in the MSSM with nonminimal flavor violation, Eur. Phys. J. C 37 (2004) 481 [hep-ph/0403228] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

44. G. Degrassi, P. Gambino and P. Slavich, QCD corrections to radiative B decays in the MSSM with minimal flavor violation, Phys. Lett. B 635 (2006) 335 [hep-ph/0601135] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

45. W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras and D. Guadagnoli, The MFV limit of the MSSM for low tan β: meson mixings revisited, JHEP 11 (2007) 065 [hep-ph/0703200] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

46. G. Degrassi, P. Gambino and P. Slavich, SusyBSG: a Fortran code for BR[B → X _s γ] in the MSSM with minimal flavor violation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 (2008) 759 [arXiv:0712.3265] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

47. M. Carena, A. Menon and C.E.M. Wagner, Minimal flavor violation and the scale of supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 075025 [arXiv:0812.3594] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

48. P. Paradisi and D.M. Straub, The SUSY CP problem and the MFV principle, Phys. Lett. B 684 (2010) 147 [arXiv:0906.4551] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

49. J. Berger, C. Csáki, Y. Grossman and B. Heidenreich, Mesino oscillation in MFV SUSY, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2408 [arXiv:1209.4645] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

50. S.L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Weak interactions with lepton-hadron symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 2 (1970) 1285 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

51. G. Colangelo, E. Nikolidakis and C. Smith, Supersymmetric models with minimal flavour violation and their running, Eur. Phys. J. C 59 (2009) 75 [arXiv:0807.0801] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

52. S.S. AbdusSalam, The full 24-parameter MSSM exploration, AIP Conf. Proc. 1078 (2009) 297 [arXiv:0809.0284] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

53. C.F. Berger, J.S. Gainer, J.L. Hewett and T.G. Rizzo, Supersymmetry without prejudice, JHEP 02 (2009) 023 [arXiv:0812.0980] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

54. M.W. Cahill-Rowley, J.L. Hewett, A. Ismail and T.G. Rizzo, More energy, more searches, but the phenomenological MSSM lives on, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035002 [arXiv:1211.1981] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

55. J. Ellis, R.N. Hodgkinson, J.S. Lee and A. Pilaftsis, Flavour geometry and effective Yukawa couplings in the MSSM, JHEP 02 (2010) 016 [arXiv:0911.3611] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

56. S.S. AbdusSalam, B.C. Allanach, F. Quevedo, F. Feroz and M. Hobson, Fitting the phenomenological MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095012 [arXiv:0904.2548] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

57. E. Nikolidakis and C. Smith, Minimal flavor violation, seesaw and R-parity, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 015021 [arXiv:0710.3129] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

58. C. Csáki, Y. Grossman and B. Heidenreich, MFV SUSY: a natural theory for R-parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 095009 [arXiv:1111.1239] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

59. J. Berger, M. Perelstein, M. Saelim and P. Tanedo, The same-sign dilepton signature of RPV/MFV SUSY, JHEP 04 (2013) 077 [arXiv:1302.2146] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

60. G. Arcadi, L. Di Luzio and M. Nardecchia, Minimal flavour violation and neutrino masses without R-parity, JHEP 05 (2012) 048 [arXiv:1111.3941] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

61. C. Smith, Minimal flavor violation in supersymmetric theories, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 3 (2010) 53 [arXiv:0909.4444] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

62. F. Feroz et al., Bayesian selection of sign(μ) within mSUGRA in global fits including WMAP5 results, JHEP 10 (2008) 064 [arXiv:0807.4512] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

63. S.S. AbdusSalam, B.C. Allanach, M.J. Dolan, F. Feroz and M.P. Hobson, Selecting a model of supersymmetry breaking mediation, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 035017 [arXiv:0906.0957] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

64. S.S. AbdusSalam and F. Quevedo, Cold dark matter hypotheses in the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 700 (2011) 343 [arXiv:1009.4308] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

65. S.S. AbdusSalam, Can the LHC rule out the MSSM?, Phys. Lett. B 705 (2011) 331 [arXiv:1106.2317] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

66. S.S. AbdusSalam et al., Benchmark models, planes, lines and points for future SUSY searches at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1835 [arXiv:1109.3859] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

67. S.S. AbdusSalam and D. Choudhury, Higgs boson discovery versus sparticles prediction: Impact on the pMSSM’s posterior samples from a Bayesian global fit, UJPA 2 (2014) 155 [arXiv:1210.3331] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

68. S.S. AbdusSalam, LHC-7 supersymmetry search interpretation within the phenomenological MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115012 [arXiv:1211.0999] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

69. S.S. AbdusSalam, Stop-mass prediction in naturalness scenarios within MSSM-25, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1450160 [arXiv:1312.7830] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

70. S. Sekmen et al., Interpreting LHC SUSY searches in the phenomenological MSSM, JHEP 02 (2012) 075 [arXiv:1109.5119] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

71. A. Bartl et al., General flavor blind MSSM and CP-violation, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 076009 [hep-ph/0103324] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

72. J.R. Ellis, J.S. Lee and A. Pilaftsis, B-meson observables in the maximally CP-Violating MSSM with minimal flavour violation, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 115011 [arXiv:0708.2079] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

73. L. Mercolli and C. Smith, EDM constraints on flavored CP-violating phases, Nucl. Phys. B 817 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0902.1949] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

74. J. Berger et al., The CP-violating pMSSM at the intensity frontier, arXiv:1309.7653 [INSPIRE].

75. M. Verzocchi, Electroweak physics, talk gven at 34^th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP2008), July 30-August 5, Philadelphia, U.S.A. (2008).

76. ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, SLD, LEP Electroweak Working Group, SLD Electroweak Group, SLD Heavy Flavour Group collaboration, S. Schael et al., Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance, Phys. Rept. 427 (2006) 257 [hep-ex/0509008] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

77. LHCb collaboration, First evidence for the decay B ⁰ _s  → μ ⁺ μ ⁻, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 021801 [arXiv:1211.2674] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

78. CDF collaboration, A. Abulencia et al., Observation of \( {B}_s^0-{\overline{B}}_s^0 \) oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 242003 [hep-ex/0609040] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

79. BaBar collaboration, B. Aubert et al., Search for the rare leptonic decay \( {B}^{-}\to {\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 041804 [hep-ex/0407038] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

80. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, E. Barberio et al., Averages of b-hadron and c-hadron properties at the end of 2007, arXiv:0808.1297 [INSPIRE].

81. WMAP collaboration, E. Komatsu et al., Five-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: cosmological interpretation, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 180 (2009) 330 [arXiv:0803.0547] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

82. ATLAS collaboration, Combined measurements of the mass and signal strength of the Higgs-like boson with the ATLAS detector using up to 25 fb ⁻¹ of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-014 (2013).

83. CMS collaboration, Combination of standard model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, CMS-PAS-HIG-13-005 (2013).

84. LHCb collaboration, Search for the rare decays B ⁰ _s  → μ ⁺ μ ⁻ and B ⁰ → μ ⁺ μ ⁻, Phys. Lett. B 699 (2011) 330 [arXiv:1103.2465] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

85. Muon g-2 collaboration, R. McNabb, An improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the muon, hep-ex/0407008 [INSPIRE].

86. Heavy Flavor Averaging Group collaboration, E. Barberio et al., Averages of b-hadron properties at the end of 2006, arXiv:0704.3575 [INSPIRE].

87. Particle Data Group collaboration, K. Nakamura et al., Review of particle physics, J. Phys. G 37 (2010) 075021 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

88. B.C. Regan, E.D. Commins, C.J. Schmidt and D. DeMille, New limit on the electron electric dipole moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 071805 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

89. W. Porod, SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e ⁺ e ⁻ colliders, Comput. Phys. Commun. 153 (2003) 275 [hep-ph/0301101] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

90. W. Porod and F. Staub, SPheno 3.1: extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458 [arXiv:1104.1573] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

91. A. Crivellin et al., SUSY FLAVOR v2: a computational tool for FCNC and CP-violating processes in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1004 [arXiv:1203.5023] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

92. J.E. Camargo-Molina, B. O’Leary, W. Porod and F. Staub, Vevacious : a tool for finding the global minima of one-loop effective potentials with many scalars, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2588 [arXiv:1307.1477] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

93. J.E. Camargo-Molina, B. Garbrecht, B. O’Leary, W. Porod and F. Staub, Constraining the natural MSSM through tunneling to color-breaking vacua at zero and non-zero temperature, Phys. Lett. B 737 (2014) 156 [arXiv:1405.7376] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

94. B.C. Allanach et al., SUSY Les Houches accord 2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 8 [arXiv:0801.0045] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

95. P.Z. Skands et al., SUSY Les Houches accord: Interfacing SUSY spectrum calculators, decay packages and event generators, JHEP 07 (2004) 036 [hep-ph/0311123] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

96. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, Dark matter direct detection rate in a generic model with MicrOMEGAs 2.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 747 [arXiv:0803.2360] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

97. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, D. Stöckinger, A.M. Weber and G. Weiglein, Precise prediction for M(W) in the MSSM, JHEP 08 (2006) 052 [hep-ph/0604147] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

98. S. Heinemeyer, W. Hollik, A.M. Weber and G. Weiglein, Z pole observables in the MSSM, JHEP 04 (2008) 039 [arXiv:0710.2972] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

99. F. Feroz and M.P. Hobson, Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 384 (2008) 449 [arXiv:0704.3704] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

100. F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson and M. Bridges, MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 398 (2009) 1601 [arXiv:0809.3437] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

101. J. Skilling, Nested sampling, AIP Proc. 735 (2004) 395.

     Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

102. M.M. El Kheishen, A.A. Aboshousha and A.A. Shafik, Analytic formulas for the neutralino masses and the neutralino mixing matrix, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 4345 [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

103. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Focus points and naturalness in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075005 [hep-ph/9909334] [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

104. ATLAS collaboration, Search for neutral Higgs bosons of the minimal supersymmetric standard model in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s}=8 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2014) 056 [arXiv:1409.6064] [INSPIRE].

     ADS  Google Scholar 

105. CMS collaboration, Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons decaying to a pair of τ leptons in pp collisions, JHEP 10 (2014) 160 [arXiv:1408.3316] [INSPIRE].

     Google Scholar 

106. A.G. Cohen, D.B. Kaplan and A.E. Nelson, The more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 588 [hep-ph/9607394] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

107. M. Pospelov and A. Ritz, Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics, Annals Phys. 318 (2005) 119 [hep-ph/0504231] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

108. S. AbdusSalam, B. Allanach, F. Quevedo, F. Feroz and M. Hobson, The posterior sample points’ SLHA files from the Bayesian fits of the phenomenological MSSM, Harvard Dataverse Network (2013).

109. The International Linear Collider technical design report, volumes 1-5, ILC-REPORT-2013-040 (2013).

110. Future Circular Collider (FCC) study, http://cern.ch/fcc.

111. M. Aicheler et al., A multi-TeV linear collider based on CLIC technology — CLIC conceptual design report, CERN-2012-007 (2012).

112. A. Fowlie and M. Raidal, Prospects for constrained supersymmetry at \( \sqrt{s}=33 \) TeV and \( \sqrt{s}=100 \) TeV proton-proton super-colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2948 [arXiv:1402.5419] [INSPIRE].

     Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references