002916053 001__ 2916053
002916053 005__ 20241219052340.0
002916053 0248_ $$aoai:cds.cern.ch:2916053$$pcerncds:FULLTEXT$$pcerncds:CERN:FULLTEXT$$pcerncds:CERN
002916053 037__ $$9arXiv$$aarXiv:2410.23098$$chep-ex
002916053 037__ $$aFERMILAB-PUB-24-0798-AD
002916053 035__ $$9arXiv$$aoai:arXiv.org:2410.23098
002916053 035__ $$9Inspire$$aoai:inspirehep.net:2843824$$d2024-12-18T14:36:10Z$$h2024-12-19T03:02:50Z$$mmarcxml$$ttrue$$uhttps://inspirehep.net/api/oai2d
002916053 035__ $$9Inspire$$a2843824
002916053 041__ $$aeng
002916053 100__ $$aAdhikary, H.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 245__ $$9arXiv$$aMeasurements of hadron production in 90 GeV/c proton-carbon interactions
002916053 269__ $$c2024-10-30
002916053 300__ $$a19 p
002916053 520__ $$9arXiv$$aThis paper presents the multiplicity of neutral and charged hadrons produced in 90 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon interactions from a dataset taken by the NA61/SHINE experiment in 2017. Particle identification via dE/dx was performed for the charged hadrons $\pi^\pm$, $K^\pm$, and $p / \bar{p}$; the neutral hadrons $K^0_S$, $\Lambda$, and $\bar{\Lambda}$ were identified via an invariant mass analysis of their decays to charged hadrons. Double-differential multiplicity results as a function of laboratory momentum and polar angle are presented for each particle species; these results provide vital constraints on the predicted neutrino beam flux for current and future long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments.
002916053 540__ $$3preprint$$aCC BY 4.0$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
002916053 65017 $$2arXiv$$ahep-ex
002916053 65017 $$2SzGeCERN$$aParticle Physics - Experiment
002916053 690C_ $$aCERN
002916053 690C_ $$aPREPRINT
002916053 693__ $$aCERN SPS$$eNA61
002916053 700__ $$aAdrich, P.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aAllison, K.K.$$uColorado U.$$vUniversity of Colorado,Boulder,USA
002916053 700__ $$aAmin, N.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe$$vKarlsruhe Institute of Technology,Karlsruhe,Germany
002916053 700__ $$aAndronov, E.V.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aArsene, I.-C.$$uOslo U.$$vUniversity of Oslo,Oslo,Norway
002916053 700__ $$aBajda, M.$$uJagiellonian U.$$vJagiellonian University,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aBalkova, Y.$$uSilesia U.$$vUniversity of Silesia,Katowice,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aBattaglia, D.$$uNotre Dame U.$$vUniversity of Notre Dame,Notre Dame,USA
002916053 700__ $$aBazgir, A.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aBhosale, S.$$uCracow, INP$$vInstitute of Nuclear Physics,Polish Academy of Sciences,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aBielewicz, M.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aBlondel, A.$$uParis U., VI-VII$$vLPNHE,Sorbonne University,CNRS/IN2P3,Paris,France
002916053 700__ $$aBogomilov, M.$$uSofiya U.$$vFaculty of Physics,University of Sofia,Sofia,Bulgaria
002916053 700__ $$aBondar, Y.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aBryliński, W.$$uWarsaw U. of Tech. (main)$$vWarsaw University of Technology,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aBrzychczyk, J.$$uJagiellonian U.$$vJagiellonian University,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aBuryakov, M.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aCamino, A.F.$$uPittsburgh U.$$vUniversity of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,USA
002916053 700__ $$aChandak, Y.$$uColorado U.$$vUniversity of Colorado,Boulder,USA
002916053 700__ $$aĆirković, M.$$uBelgrade U.$$vUniversity of Belgrade,Belgrade,Serbia
002916053 700__ $$aCsanád, M.$$uEotvos U.$$vEötvös Loránd University,Budapest,Hungary
002916053 700__ $$aCybowska, J.$$uWarsaw U. of Tech. (main)$$vWarsaw University of Technology,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aCzopowicz, T.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aDalmazzone, C.$$uParis U., VI-VII$$vLPNHE,Sorbonne University,CNRS/IN2P3,Paris,France
002916053 700__ $$aDavis, N.$$uCracow, INP$$vInstitute of Nuclear Physics,Polish Academy of Sciences,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aDmitriev, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$avon Doetinchem, P.$$uHawaii U.$$vUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa,Honolulu,USA
002916053 700__ $$aDominik, W.$$uWarsaw U.$$vUniversity of Warsaw,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aDumarchez, J.$$uParis U., VI-VII$$vLPNHE,Sorbonne University,CNRS/IN2P3,Paris,France
002916053 700__ $$aEngel, R.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe$$vKarlsruhe Institute of Technology,Karlsruhe,Germany
002916053 700__ $$aFeofilov, G.A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aFields, L.$$uNotre Dame U.$$vUniversity of Notre Dame,Notre Dame,USA
002916053 700__ $$aFodor, Z.$$uWigner RCP, Budapest$$uWroclaw U.$$vHUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics,Budapest,Hungary$$vUniversity of Wrocław,Wrocław,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aFriend, M.$$uKEK, Tsukuba$$vInstitute for Particle and Nuclear Studies,Tsukuba,Japan
002916053 700__ $$aGaździcki, M.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aGollwitzer, K.E.$$uFermilab$$vFermilab,Batavia,USA
002916053 700__ $$aGolosov, O.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aGolovatyuk, V.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aGolubeva, M.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aGrebieszkow, K.$$uWarsaw U. of Tech. (main)$$vWarsaw University of Technology,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aGuber, F.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aHurh, P.G.$$uFermilab$$vFermilab,Batavia,USA
002916053 700__ $$aIlieva, S.$$uSofiya U.$$vFaculty of Physics,University of Sofia,Sofia,Bulgaria
002916053 700__ $$aIvashkin, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aIzvestnyy, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aKarpushkin, N.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aKiełbowicz, M.$$uCracow, INP$$vInstitute of Nuclear Physics,Polish Academy of Sciences,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aKireyeu, V.A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aKolesnikov, R.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aKolev, D.$$uSofiya U.$$vFaculty of Physics,University of Sofia,Sofia,Bulgaria
002916053 700__ $$aKoshio, Y.$$uOkayama U.$$vOkayama University,Japan
002916053 700__ $$aKowalski, S.$$uSilesia U.$$vUniversity of Silesia,Katowice,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aKozłowski, B.$$uWarsaw U. of Tech. (main)$$vWarsaw University of Technology,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aKrasnoperov, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aKucewicz, W.$$uAGH-UST, Cracow$$vAGH - University of Krakow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aKuchowicz, M.$$uWroclaw U.$$vUniversity of Wrocław,Wrocław,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aKuich, M.$$uWarsaw U.$$vUniversity of Warsaw,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aKurepin, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aLászló, A.$$uWigner RCP, Budapest$$vHUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics,Budapest,Hungary
002916053 700__ $$aLewicki, M.$$uCracow, INP$$vInstitute of Nuclear Physics,Polish Academy of Sciences,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aLykasov, G.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aLyubushkin, V.V.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aMaćkowiak-Pawłowska, M.$$uWarsaw U. of Tech. (main)$$vWarsaw University of Technology,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aMakhnev, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aMaksiak, B.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aMalakhov, A.I.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aMarcinek, A.$$uCracow, INP$$vInstitute of Nuclear Physics,Polish Academy of Sciences,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aMarino, A.D.$$uColorado U.$$vUniversity of Colorado,Boulder,USA
002916053 700__ $$aMathes, H.-J.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe$$vKarlsruhe Institute of Technology,Karlsruhe,Germany
002916053 700__ $$aMatulewicz, T.$$uWarsaw U.$$vUniversity of Warsaw,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aMatveev, V.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aMelkumov, G.L.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aMerzlaya, A.$$uOslo U.$$vUniversity of Oslo,Oslo,Norway
002916053 700__ $$aMik, Ł.$$uAGH-UST, Cracow$$vAGH - University of Krakow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aMorozov, S.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aNagai, Y.$$uEotvos U.$$vEötvös Loránd University,Budapest,Hungary
002916053 700__ $$aNakadaira, T.$$uKEK, Tsukuba$$vInstitute for Particle and Nuclear Studies,Tsukuba,Japan
002916053 700__ $$aNaskręt, M.$$uWroclaw U.$$vUniversity of Wrocław,Wrocław,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aNishimori, S.$$uKEK, Tsukuba$$vInstitute for Particle and Nuclear Studies,Tsukuba,Japan
002916053 700__ $$aOlivier, A.$$uNotre Dame U.$$vUniversity of Notre Dame,Notre Dame,USA
002916053 700__ $$aOzvenchuk, V.$$uCracow, INP$$vInstitute of Nuclear Physics,Polish Academy of Sciences,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aPanova, O.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aPaolone, V.$$uPittsburgh U.$$vUniversity of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh,USA
002916053 700__ $$aPetukhov, O.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aPidhurskyi, I.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aPłaneta, R.$$uJagiellonian U.$$vJagiellonian University,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aPodlaski, P.$$uWarsaw U.$$vUniversity of Warsaw,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aPopov, B.A.$$uParis U., VI-VII$$uUnlisted$$vLPNHE,Sorbonne University,CNRS/IN2P3,Paris,France$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aPórfy, B.$$uWigner RCP, Budapest$$uEotvos U.$$vHUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics,Budapest,Hungary$$vEötvös Loránd University,Budapest,Hungary
002916053 700__ $$aProkhorova, D.S.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aPszczel, D.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aPuławski, S.$$uSilesia U.$$vUniversity of Silesia,Katowice,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aRenfordt, R.$$uSilesia U.$$vUniversity of Silesia,Katowice,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aRen, L.$$uColorado U.$$vUniversity of Colorado,Boulder,USA
002916053 700__ $$aReyna Ortiz, V.Z.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aRöhrich, D.$$uBergen U.$$vUniversity of Bergen,Bergen,Norway
002916053 700__ $$aRondio, E.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aRoth, M.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe$$vKarlsruhe Institute of Technology,Karlsruhe,Germany
002916053 700__ $$aRozpłochowski, Ł.$$uCracow, INP$$vInstitute of Nuclear Physics,Polish Academy of Sciences,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aRumberger, B.T.$$uColorado U.$$vUniversity of Colorado,Boulder,USA
002916053 700__ $$aRumyantsev, M.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aRustamov, A.$$uNNRC, Baku$$vNational Nuclear Research Center,Baku,Azerbaijan
002916053 700__ $$aRybczynski, M.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aRybicki, A.$$uCracow, INP$$vInstitute of Nuclear Physics,Polish Academy of Sciences,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aRybka, D.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aSakashita, K.$$uKEK, Tsukuba$$vInstitute for Particle and Nuclear Studies,Tsukuba,Japan
002916053 700__ $$aSchmidt, K.$$uSilesia U.$$vUniversity of Silesia,Katowice,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aSeryakov, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aSeyboth, P.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aShah, U.A.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aShiraishi, Y.$$uOkayama U.$$vOkayama University,Japan
002916053 700__ $$aShukla, A.$$uHawaii U.$$vUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa,Honolulu,USA
002916053 700__ $$aSłodkowski, M.$$uWarsaw U. of Tech. (main)$$vWarsaw University of Technology,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aStaszel, P.$$uJagiellonian U.$$vJagiellonian University,Cracow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aStefanek, G.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aStepaniak, J.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aŚwiderski, Ł.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aSzewiński, J.$$uNCBJ, Warsaw$$vNational Centre for Nuclear Research,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aSzukiewicz, R.$$uWroclaw U.$$vUniversity of Wrocław,Wrocław,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aTaranenko, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aTefelska, A.$$uWarsaw U. of Tech. (main)$$vWarsaw University of Technology,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aTefelski, D.$$uWarsaw U. of Tech. (main)$$vWarsaw University of Technology,Warsaw,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aTereshchenko, V.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aTsenov, R.$$uSofiya U.$$vFaculty of Physics,University of Sofia,Sofia,Bulgaria
002916053 700__ $$aTurko, L.$$uWroclaw U.$$vUniversity of Wrocław,Wrocław,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aTveter, T.S.$$uOslo U.$$vUniversity of Oslo,Oslo,Norway
002916053 700__ $$aUnger, M.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe$$vKarlsruhe Institute of Technology,Karlsruhe,Germany
002916053 700__ $$aUrbaniak, M.$$uSilesia U.$$vUniversity of Silesia,Katowice,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aVeberič, D.$$uKIT, Karlsruhe$$vKarlsruhe Institute of Technology,Karlsruhe,Germany
002916053 700__ $$aVitiuk, O.$$uWroclaw U.$$vUniversity of Wrocław,Wrocław,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aVolkov, V.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aWickremasinghe, A.$$uFermilab$$vFermilab,Batavia,USA
002916053 700__ $$aWitek, K.$$uAGH-UST, Cracow$$vAGH - University of Krakow,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aWójcik, K.$$uSilesia U.$$vUniversity of Silesia,Katowice,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aWyszyński, O.$$uJan Kochanowski U.$$vJan Kochanowski University,Kielce,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aZaitsev, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 700__ $$aZherebtsova, E.$$uWroclaw U.$$vUniversity of Wrocław,Wrocław,Poland
002916053 700__ $$aZimmerman, E.D.$$uColorado U.$$vUniversity of Colorado,Boulder,USA
002916053 700__ $$aZviagina, A.$$uUnlisted$$vAffiliated with an institution covered by a cooperation agreement with CERN
002916053 710__ $$gNA61/SHINE Collaboration
002916053 8564_ $$uhttps://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2024/pub/fermilab-pub-24-0798-ad.pdf$$yFermilab Library Server
002916053 8564_ $$82651651$$s113103$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/comparisonPiPlus_4_WithLegend.png$$y00047 Example comparison in the measured differential multiplicity between the 2017 90 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data analyzed in this manuscript and the 2016 and 2017 120 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data~\cite{adhikary2023measurementscharged}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651652$$s64205$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/uncertainty_PiMinus_5.png$$y00019 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ systematic uncertainty breakdown for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. For each kinematic bin shown in the plot, the total uncertainty is shown in black, and all of the constituent uncertainties are shown as well. These uncertainties correspond to the multiplicity measurements shown in Figure~\ref{fig:samplePionMultiplicities}. The bins before the Bethe--Bloch overlap region generally have higher uncertainty than the bins after the overlap region, as can be seen here.
002916053 8564_ $$82651653$$s40904$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesKaonMinus.png$$y00044 Multiplicity measurements for the $K^{\pm}$ analyses. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651654$$s36116$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/KMinus_5.png$$y00033 Example $K^{\pm}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in light purple, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651655$$s133843$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/Lam_3_WithLegend.png$$y00022 Example $\Lambda$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.04, 0.06) rad and [0.06, 0.10) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651656$$s133936$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/PPlus_7_WithLegend.png$$y00034 Example $p / \bar{p}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.05, 0.06) rad and [0.06, 0.08) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in dark blue, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651657$$s82286$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/positiveTrackDEDX_WithTrackQualityCuts.png$$y00008 Two-dimensional distributions of charged track \dedx vs. $\ln(p)$ after applying track quality cuts. The lines on the plot represent the Bethe--Bloch predictions for each particle species in the energy loss fit. A prominent peak in the positively charged track \dedx distribution is visible at the beam momentum of 90 GeV/$c$ (ln($p$ / [GeV/$c$]) = 4.50) in the left plot; the right plot shows the negatively charged track \dedx distribution.
002916053 8564_ $$82651658$$s138614$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/sampleK0SMassFit.png$$y00005 Example invariant mass fits for $K^0_S$, $\Lambda$, and $\bar{\Lambda}$. The signal shape is shown alone in red, the background is shown in blue, and the sum of the signal and background is shown in black. At the bottom of each fit is a plot of the fit residual over the statistical uncertainty on the number of entries for each bin; the fit residual is the fit result minus the number of entries.
002916053 8564_ $$82651659$$s121440$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/ALam_3_WithLegend.png$$y00025 Example $\bar{\Lambda}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0, 0.04) rad and [0.04, 0.08) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651660$$s3938649$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2410.23098.pdf$$yFulltext
002916053 8564_ $$82651661$$s62915$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/negativeTrackDEDX_WithTrackQualityCuts.png$$y00009 Two-dimensional distributions of charged track \dedx vs. $\ln(p)$ after applying track quality cuts. The lines on the plot represent the Bethe--Bloch predictions for each particle species in the energy loss fit. A prominent peak in the positively charged track \dedx distribution is visible at the beam momentum of 90 GeV/$c$ (ln($p$ / [GeV/$c$]) = 4.50) in the left plot; the right plot shows the negatively charged track \dedx distribution.
002916053 8564_ $$82651662$$s133407$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/KPlus_4_WithLegend.png$$y00030 Example $K^{\pm}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in light purple, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651663$$s38786$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesLam.png$$y00039 Multiplicity measurements for the $\Lambda$ analysis. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651664$$s55559$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/uncertainty_PiPlus_5.png$$y00017 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ systematic uncertainty breakdown for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. For each kinematic bin shown in the plot, the total uncertainty is shown in black, and all of the constituent uncertainties are shown as well. These uncertainties correspond to the multiplicity measurements shown in Figure~\ref{fig:samplePionMultiplicities}. The bins before the Bethe--Bloch overlap region generally have higher uncertainty than the bins after the overlap region, as can be seen here.
002916053 8564_ $$82651665$$s61401$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/uncertainty_PiPlus_4.png$$y00016 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ systematic uncertainty breakdown for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. For each kinematic bin shown in the plot, the total uncertainty is shown in black, and all of the constituent uncertainties are shown as well. These uncertainties correspond to the multiplicity measurements shown in Figure~\ref{fig:samplePionMultiplicities}. The bins before the Bethe--Bloch overlap region generally have higher uncertainty than the bins after the overlap region, as can be seen here.
002916053 8564_ $$82651666$$s96806$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/uncertaintyLegendNeutral.png$$y00012 Example $K^0_S$ systematic uncertainty breakdown for the angular bins [0, 0.02) rad and [0.02, 0.04) rad. For each kinematic bin shown in the plot, the total uncertainty is shown in black, and all of the constituent uncertainties are shown as well. These uncertainties correspond to the multiplicity measurements shown in Figure \ref{fig:sampleK0SMultiplicities}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651667$$s32309$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/PMinus_8.png$$y00037 Example $p / \bar{p}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.05, 0.06) rad and [0.06, 0.08) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in dark blue, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651668$$s110959$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/sampleALamMassFit.png$$y00007 Example invariant mass fits for $K^0_S$, $\Lambda$, and $\bar{\Lambda}$. The signal shape is shown alone in red, the background is shown in blue, and the sum of the signal and background is shown in black. At the bottom of each fit is a plot of the fit residual over the statistical uncertainty on the number of entries for each bin; the fit residual is the fit result minus the number of entries.
002916053 8564_ $$82651669$$s141466$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/PiPlus_4_WithLegend.png$$y00026 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651670$$s63056$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/uncertainty_PiMinus_4.png$$y00018 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ systematic uncertainty breakdown for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. For each kinematic bin shown in the plot, the total uncertainty is shown in black, and all of the constituent uncertainties are shown as well. These uncertainties correspond to the multiplicity measurements shown in Figure~\ref{fig:samplePionMultiplicities}. The bins before the Bethe--Bloch overlap region generally have higher uncertainty than the bins after the overlap region, as can be seen here.
002916053 8564_ $$82651671$$s54404$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/apPlotAntiLambda.png$$y00004 Armenteros-Podolanski distributions before (top left) and after applying all of the cuts in the neutral-hadron analyses to select $K^0_S$ (top-right), $\Lambda$ (bottom-left), and $\bar{\Lambda}$ (bottom-right). $\alpha$ is the longitudinal momentum asymmetry of the decay products, as defined in Equation \ref{eq:apAlpha}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651672$$s138600$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/positiveSampleEnergyLossFit.png$$y00010 Example of a \dedx distribution fit for one kinematic bin. Both the positively and negatively charged track fits are shown, and both fits show a clear abundance of pions. At the bottom of each fit is a plot of the fit residual over the statistical uncertainty on the number of entries for each bin; the fit residual is the fit result minus the number of entries.
002916053 8564_ $$82651673$$s112103$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/negativeSampleEnergyLossFit.png$$y00011 Example of a \dedx distribution fit for one kinematic bin. Both the positively and negatively charged track fits are shown, and both fits show a clear abundance of pions. At the bottom of each fit is a plot of the fit residual over the statistical uncertainty on the number of entries for each bin; the fit residual is the fit result minus the number of entries.
002916053 8564_ $$82651674$$s64805$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/uncertaintyLegendCharged.png$$y00015 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ systematic uncertainty breakdown for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. For each kinematic bin shown in the plot, the total uncertainty is shown in black, and all of the constituent uncertainties are shown as well. These uncertainties correspond to the multiplicity measurements shown in Figure~\ref{fig:samplePionMultiplicities}. The bins before the Bethe--Bloch overlap region generally have higher uncertainty than the bins after the overlap region, as can be seen here.
002916053 8564_ $$82651675$$s32480$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesPiPlus.png$$y00041 Multiplicity measurements for the $\pi^{\pm}$ analyses. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651676$$s194217$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/apPlotAll.png$$y00001 Armenteros-Podolanski distributions before (top left) and after applying all of the cuts in the neutral-hadron analyses to select $K^0_S$ (top-right), $\Lambda$ (bottom-left), and $\bar{\Lambda}$ (bottom-right). $\alpha$ is the longitudinal momentum asymmetry of the decay products, as defined in Equation \ref{eq:apAlpha}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651677$$s89172$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/apPlotK0S.png$$y00002 Armenteros-Podolanski distributions before (top left) and after applying all of the cuts in the neutral-hadron analyses to select $K^0_S$ (top-right), $\Lambda$ (bottom-left), and $\bar{\Lambda}$ (bottom-right). $\alpha$ is the longitudinal momentum asymmetry of the decay products, as defined in Equation \ref{eq:apAlpha}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651678$$s9503$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/ALam_2.png$$y00024 Example $\bar{\Lambda}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0, 0.04) rad and [0.04, 0.08) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651679$$s35312$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesALam.png$$y00040 Multiplicity measurements for the $\bar{\Lambda}$ analysis. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651680$$s32637$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesPiMinus.png$$y00042 Multiplicity measurements for the $\pi^{\pm}$ analyses. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651681$$s37410$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/KMinus_4.png$$y00032 Example $K^{\pm}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in light purple, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651682$$s112246$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/sampleLamMassFit.png$$y00006 Example invariant mass fits for $K^0_S$, $\Lambda$, and $\bar{\Lambda}$. The signal shape is shown alone in red, the background is shown in blue, and the sum of the signal and background is shown in black. At the bottom of each fit is a plot of the fit residual over the statistical uncertainty on the number of entries for each bin; the fit residual is the fit result minus the number of entries.
002916053 8564_ $$82651683$$s36421$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/PiMinus_5.png$$y00029 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651684$$s36730$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/PiMinus_4.png$$y00028 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651685$$s34391$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/K0S_2.png$$y00021 Example $K^0_S$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0, 0.02) rad and [0.02, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651686$$s34164$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/PPlus_8.png$$y00035 Example $p / \bar{p}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.05, 0.06) rad and [0.06, 0.08) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in dark blue, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651687$$s12108$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/comparisonPiPlus_5.png$$y00048 Example comparison in the measured differential multiplicity between the 2017 90 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data analyzed in this manuscript and the 2016 and 2017 120 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data~\cite{adhikary2023measurementscharged}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651688$$s281926$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/NA61DetectorSetup-FTPCs.png$$y00000 Top-view schematic layout of the NA61/SHINE detector at the CERN SPS \cite{abgrall2014na61} showing the components present in the 2017 90 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data taking. The detector configuration upstream of the target is shown in the inset. The alignment of the chosen coordinate system is shown on the plot; its origin $(x=y=z=0)$ lies in the middle of VTPC-2, on the beam axis. The nominal beam direction is along the $z$-axis. Target is placed at $z = -590.20$ cm. The magnetic field bends charged particle trajectories in the $x$-$z$ (horizontal) plane. The drift direction in the TPCs is along the (vertical) $y$-axis.
002916053 8564_ $$82651689$$s45027$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/apPlotLambda.png$$y00003 Armenteros-Podolanski distributions before (top left) and after applying all of the cuts in the neutral-hadron analyses to select $K^0_S$ (top-right), $\Lambda$ (bottom-left), and $\bar{\Lambda}$ (bottom-right). $\alpha$ is the longitudinal momentum asymmetry of the decay products, as defined in Equation \ref{eq:apAlpha}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651690$$s34606$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesProtonMinus.png$$y00046 Multiplicity measurements for the $p / \bar{p}$ analyses. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651691$$s12443$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/comparisonPiMinus_4.png$$y00049 Example comparison in the measured differential multiplicity between the 2017 90 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data analyzed in this manuscript and the 2016 and 2017 120 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data~\cite{adhikary2023measurementscharged}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651692$$s11756$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/comparisonPiMinus_5.png$$y00050 Example comparison in the measured differential multiplicity between the 2017 90 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data analyzed in this manuscript and the 2016 and 2017 120 GeV$/c$ proton-carbon data~\cite{adhikary2023measurementscharged}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651693$$s30737$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/Lam_4.png$$y00023 Example $\Lambda$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.04, 0.06) rad and [0.06, 0.10) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651694$$s39849$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesKaonPlus.png$$y00043 Multiplicity measurements for the $K^{\pm}$ analyses. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651695$$s35437$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesProtonPlus.png$$y00045 Multiplicity measurements for the $p / \bar{p}$ analyses. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651696$$s37172$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/KPlus_5.png$$y00031 Example $K^{\pm}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in light purple, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651697$$s143801$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/K0S_1_WithLegend.png$$y00020 Example $K^0_S$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0, 0.02) rad and [0.02, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651698$$s33775$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/2DMultiplicitiesK0S.png$$y00038 Multiplicity measurements for the $K^0_S$ analysis. Numerical results can be found in \cite{pC90EDMS}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651699$$s59348$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/uncertainty_K0S_1.png$$y00013 Example $K^0_S$ systematic uncertainty breakdown for the angular bins [0, 0.02) rad and [0.02, 0.04) rad. For each kinematic bin shown in the plot, the total uncertainty is shown in black, and all of the constituent uncertainties are shown as well. These uncertainties correspond to the multiplicity measurements shown in Figure \ref{fig:sampleK0SMultiplicities}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651700$$s62455$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/uncertainty_K0S_2.png$$y00014 Example $K^0_S$ systematic uncertainty breakdown for the angular bins [0, 0.02) rad and [0.02, 0.04) rad. For each kinematic bin shown in the plot, the total uncertainty is shown in black, and all of the constituent uncertainties are shown as well. These uncertainties correspond to the multiplicity measurements shown in Figure \ref{fig:sampleK0SMultiplicities}.
002916053 8564_ $$82651701$$s37264$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/PMinus_7.png$$y00036 Example $p / \bar{p}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.05, 0.06) rad and [0.06, 0.08) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in dark blue, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82651702$$s37379$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/PiPlus_5.png$$y00027 Example $\pi^{\pm}$ multiplicity measurements for the angular bins [0.02, 0.03) rad and [0.03, 0.04) rad. The uncertainties shown are the total ones. The data points, shown in red, are compared to four physics lists from \GeantFour version 10.7.0.
002916053 8564_ $$82680752$$s3715950$$uhttp://cds.cern.ch/record/2916053/files/f1353e6490dab74eab2ed4d276256c15.pdf$$yFulltext
002916053 960__ $$a11
002916053 980__ $$aPREPRINT