Differential cross-section measurements of the production of four charged leptons in association with two jets using the ATLAS detector
- Aad, Georges et al
- arXiv:2308.12324CERN-EP-2023-152
| Example Feynman diagrams for EW \zzjjtwo{} production (left) and strong \zzjjtwo{} production (right). The scattered quarks (labelled $q$ and $q^\prime$) produce the hadronic jets observed in the final state. |
| Example Feynman diagrams for EW \zzjjtwo{} production (left) and strong \zzjjtwo{} production (right). The scattered quarks (labelled $q$ and $q^\prime$) produce the hadronic jets observed in the final state. |
| Predicted and observed yields as a function of \mjj{} (top) and \mfl{} (bottom), measured in the VBS-enhanced (left) and VBS-suppressed (right) regions. The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The background arising from non-prompt leptons is estimated using a data-driven technique as outlined in Section~\ref{sec:background}. Background processes with four prompt leptons, such as $t\bar{t}Z$ production and the fully leptonic decays of $WWZ$ and $WZZ$ production, are estimated by using simulations and labelled as `Other.' The total uncertainty on the combined signal and background prediction is shown as a grey band (the calculation of these uncertainties is outlined in Section~\ref{sec:systematics}). |
| Predicted and observed yields as a function of \mjj{} (top) and \mfl{} (bottom), measured in the VBS-enhanced (left) and VBS-suppressed (right) regions. The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The background arising from non-prompt leptons is estimated using a data-driven technique as outlined in Section~\ref{sec:background}. Background processes with four prompt leptons, such as $t\bar{t}Z$ production and the fully leptonic decays of $WWZ$ and $WZZ$ production, are estimated by using simulations and labelled as `Other.' The total uncertainty on the combined signal and background prediction is shown as a grey band (the calculation of these uncertainties is outlined in Section~\ref{sec:systematics}). |
| Predicted and observed yields as a function of \mjj{} (top) and \mfl{} (bottom), measured in the VBS-enhanced (left) and VBS-suppressed (right) regions. The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The background arising from non-prompt leptons is estimated using a data-driven technique as outlined in Section~\ref{sec:background}. Background processes with four prompt leptons, such as $t\bar{t}Z$ production and the fully leptonic decays of $WWZ$ and $WZZ$ production, are estimated by using simulations and labelled as `Other.' The total uncertainty on the combined signal and background prediction is shown as a grey band (the calculation of these uncertainties is outlined in Section~\ref{sec:systematics}). |
| Predicted and observed yields as a function of \mjj{} (top) and \mfl{} (bottom), measured in the VBS-enhanced (left) and VBS-suppressed (right) regions. The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The background arising from non-prompt leptons is estimated using a data-driven technique as outlined in Section~\ref{sec:background}. Background processes with four prompt leptons, such as $t\bar{t}Z$ production and the fully leptonic decays of $WWZ$ and $WZZ$ production, are estimated by using simulations and labelled as `Other.' The total uncertainty on the combined signal and background prediction is shown as a grey band (the calculation of these uncertainties is outlined in Section~\ref{sec:systematics}). |
| Predicted and observed yields as a function of \mjj{} (top) and \mfl{} (bottom), measured in the VBS-enhanced (left) and VBS-suppressed (right) regions. The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The background arising from non-prompt leptons is estimated using a data-driven technique as outlined in Section~\ref{sec:background}. Background processes with four prompt leptons, such as $t\bar{t}Z$ production and the fully leptonic decays of $WWZ$ and $WZZ$ production, are estimated by using simulations and labelled as `Other.' The total uncertainty on the combined signal and background prediction is shown as a grey band (the calculation of these uncertainties is outlined in Section~\ref{sec:systematics}). |
| Predicted and observed yields as a function of \mjj{} (top) and \mfl{} (bottom), measured in the VBS-enhanced (left) and VBS-suppressed (right) regions. The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The background arising from non-prompt leptons is estimated using a data-driven technique as outlined in Section~\ref{sec:background}. Background processes with four prompt leptons, such as $t\bar{t}Z$ production and the fully leptonic decays of $WWZ$ and $WZZ$ production, are estimated by using simulations and labelled as `Other.' The total uncertainty on the combined signal and background prediction is shown as a grey band (the calculation of these uncertainties is outlined in Section~\ref{sec:systematics}). |
| Predicted and observed yields as a function of \mjj{} (top) and \mfl{} (bottom), measured in the VBS-enhanced (left) and VBS-suppressed (right) regions. The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The background arising from non-prompt leptons is estimated using a data-driven technique as outlined in Section~\ref{sec:background}. Background processes with four prompt leptons, such as $t\bar{t}Z$ production and the fully leptonic decays of $WWZ$ and $WZZ$ production, are estimated by using simulations and labelled as `Other.' The total uncertainty on the combined signal and background prediction is shown as a grey band (the calculation of these uncertainties is outlined in Section~\ref{sec:systematics}). |
| Predicted and observed yields as a function of \mjj{} (top) and \mfl{} (bottom), measured in the VBS-enhanced (left) and VBS-suppressed (right) regions. The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The background arising from non-prompt leptons is estimated using a data-driven technique as outlined in Section~\ref{sec:background}. Background processes with four prompt leptons, such as $t\bar{t}Z$ production and the fully leptonic decays of $WWZ$ and $WZZ$ production, are estimated by using simulations and labelled as `Other.' The total uncertainty on the combined signal and background prediction is shown as a grey band (the calculation of these uncertainties is outlined in Section~\ref{sec:systematics}). |
| Systematic uncertainties in the differential cross section for \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). |
| Systematic uncertainties in the differential cross section for \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). |
| Systematic uncertainties in the differential cross section for \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). |
| Systematic uncertainties in the differential cross section for \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared with two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared with two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared with two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared with two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \Dphijj{} (left) and \cosTS{} (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as in Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \Dphijj{} (left) and \cosTS{} (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as in Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \Dphijj{} (left) and \cosTS{} (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as in Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \Dphijj{} (left) and \cosTS{} (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as in Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfljj{} (left) and \STfljj{} (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as in Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfljj{} (left) and \STfljj{} (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as in Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfljj{} (left) and \STfljj{} (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as in Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfljj{} (left) and \STfljj{} (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as in Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as for Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as for Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as for Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \mfl{} (left) and \mjj (right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The theoretical predictions are constructed in the same way as for Figure~\ref{fig:unfolded-vbsenh-masses}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,0}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,1}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,0}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,1}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,0}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,1}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,0}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,1}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \Dyjj{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo{} for the second $Z$ boson candidate (bottom right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \pTfl{}, \pTjj and \Dyjj{} measurements, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \Dyjj{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo{} for the second $Z$ boson candidate (bottom right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \pTfl{}, \pTjj and \Dyjj{} measurements, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \Dyjj{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo{} for the second $Z$ boson candidate (bottom right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \pTfl{}, \pTjj and \Dyjj{} measurements, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \Dyjj{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo{} for the second $Z$ boson candidate (bottom right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \pTfl{}, \pTjj and \Dyjj{} measurements, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \Dyjj{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo{} for the second $Z$ boson candidate (bottom right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \pTfl{}, \pTjj and \Dyjj{} measurements, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \Dyjj{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo{} for the second $Z$ boson candidate (bottom right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \pTfl{}, \pTjj and \Dyjj{} measurements, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \Dyjj{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo{} for the second $Z$ boson candidate (bottom right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \pTfl{}, \pTjj and \Dyjj{} measurements, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-enhanced region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \Dyjj{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo{} for the second $Z$ boson candidate (bottom right). The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated by using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \pTfl{}, \pTjj and \Dyjj{} measurements, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \pTfljj{} (bottom left) and $S_{\textrm{T}, 4 \ell jj}$ (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \pTfljj{} (bottom left) and $S_{\textrm{T}, 4 \ell jj}$ (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \pTfljj{} (bottom left) and $S_{\textrm{T}, 4 \ell jj}$ (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \pTfljj{} (bottom left) and $S_{\textrm{T}, 4 \ell jj}$ (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \pTfljj{} (bottom left) and $S_{\textrm{T}, 4 \ell jj}$ (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \pTfljj{} (bottom left) and $S_{\textrm{T}, 4 \ell jj}$ (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \pTfljj{} (bottom left) and $S_{\textrm{T}, 4 \ell jj}$ (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \pTfl{} (top left), \pTjj (top right), \pTfljj{} (bottom left) and $S_{\textrm{T}, 4 \ell jj}$ (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represents the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. `Overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \Dyjj{} (top left), \Dphijj (top right), \cosTS{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represent the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \Dyjj{} measurement, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \Dyjj{} (top left), \Dphijj (top right), \cosTS{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represent the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \Dyjj{} measurement, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \Dyjj{} (top left), \Dphijj (top right), \cosTS{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represent the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \Dyjj{} measurement, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \Dyjj{} (top left), \Dphijj (top right), \cosTS{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represent the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \Dyjj{} measurement, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \Dyjj{} (top left), \Dphijj (top right), \cosTS{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represent the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \Dyjj{} measurement, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \Dyjj{} (top left), \Dphijj (top right), \cosTS{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represent the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \Dyjj{} measurement, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \Dyjj{} (top left), \Dphijj (top right), \cosTS{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represent the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \Dyjj{} measurement, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Differential cross-sections for inclusive \zzjj{} production in the VBS-suppressed region as a function of \Dyjj{} (top left), \Dphijj (top right), \cosTS{} (bottom left) and \cosTStwo (bottom right), The data are represented as black points and the associated error bars represent the statistical uncertainty. The total uncertainty in the measurement is represented as a grey hatched band. The data are compared to two theoretical predictions, estimated using \sherpa{} (triangles) and \mg{} (circles) for the strong \zzjj{} contribution and \mglo{} for the EW \zzjj{} contribution. The band on the theoretical predictions represent the theoretical uncertainty from renormalisation/factorisation scale choices and PDF choice. The dashed lines show the contribution of EW \zzjj{} production to the differential cross-section as predicted by \mglo{} and \powpyt{}. The $s$-channel contributions from $ZZV$ production are missing from the \powpyt{} prediction and are estimated with \sherpa{}. For the \Dyjj{} measurement, any `overflow' events that lie above the upper bin edge of the last bin are included in that bin. |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |
| Expected and observed 95\% confidence interval for the $f_{\textrm{T,2}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,5}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,6}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,7}}$, $f_{\textrm{T,8}}$ and $f_{\textrm{T,9}}$ Wilson coefficients as a function of a cut-off scale, $E_c$, which restricts the interference- and pure dimension-eight- contributions to have $\mfl |