CERN Accelerating science

Resonant squark produced via the $\lambda'_{ijk}L_iQ_j\Bar{D}_k$ operator at the LHC followed by its direct decay mode (top) and decay via an example of a gauge-cascade mode (bottom). Here $\tilde\chi$ denotes a chargino or neutralino, lighter than the squark.

Projected constraints based on integrated luminosities of $(150,300,3000)\SI{}{\,\femto\barn^{-1}}$ shown as blue-$($solid, dashed, dot-dashed$)$ contours. These constraints are shown as a function of the branching ratios into the two channels: ($i$) 1 jet + $X$, ($ii$) $\geq 3$ jets + $X$ where $X$ denotes either an electron or a neutrino. As reference points, we show the expected branching ratios for an RPV model featuring a \SI{1}{\TeV} gluino, bino or wino-LSP, see \cref{sec:model} for more details.

Projected constraints based on integrated luminosities of $(150,300,3000)\SI{}{\,\femto\barn^{-1}}$ shown as blue-$($solid, dashed, dot-dashed$)$ contours. These constraints are shown as a function of the branching ratios into the two channels: ($i$) 1 jet + $X$, ($ii$) $\geq 3$ jets + $X$ where $X$ denotes either an electron or a neutrino. As reference points, we show the expected branching ratios for an RPV model featuring a \SI{1}{\TeV} gluino, bino or wino-LSP, see \cref{sec:model} for more details. \textbf{Left:} We vary the systematic uncertainty on the background predictions in both channels (1\%, 10\% and 30\%) showing how the exclusion limits change. \textbf{Right:} We study how varying the QCD background rate for the three jet channel from the assumed 30\% affects our results.

Projected constraints based on integrated luminosities of $(150,300,3000)\SI{}{\,\femto\barn^{-1}}$ shown as blue-$($solid, dashed, dot-dashed$)$ contours. These constraints are shown as a function of the branching ratios into the two channels: ($i$) 1 jet + $X$, ($ii$) $\geq 3$ jets + $X$ where $X$ denotes either an electron or a neutrino. As reference points, we show the expected branching ratios for an RPV model featuring a \SI{1}{\TeV} gluino, bino or wino-LSP, see \cref{sec:model} for more details. \textbf{Left:} We vary the systematic uncertainty on the background predictions in both channels (1\%, 10\% and 30\%) showing how the exclusion limits change. \textbf{Right:} We study how varying the QCD background rate for the three jet channel from the assumed 30\% affects our results.

The search sensitivities of the single-lepton channel for the light gluino (left) and light bino (right) scenarios corresponding to two different integrated luminosities: 200\,fb$^{-1}$ (thick lines) and 3\,ab$^{-1}$ (thin lines). For the gluino case, the reach of the \texttt{SR\_ej} search is shown in turquoise and the combined reach of \texttt{SR\_ej} + \texttt{SR\_e3j} is shown in purple. For the bino case we just show the reach of \texttt{SR\_ej}. In both plots we show in gray the area excluded by existing experiments: Drell-Yan~\cite{CMS:2021ctt}, charged current universality~\cite{Barger:1989rk} and squark pair production~\cite{ATLAS:2020dsk,Beenakker:2011fu,Bornhauser:2007bf}, with each region labeled by its corresponding cause of exclusion. Finally, we show the projected limits assuming $\mathcal{L}=\SI{3}{\atto\barn^{-1}}$ for both Drell-Yan, and squark pair production as dashed grey lines.

The search sensitivities of the single-lepton channel for the light gluino (left) and light bino (right) scenarios corresponding to two different integrated luminosities: 200\,fb$^{-1}$ (thick lines) and 3\,ab$^{-1}$ (thin lines). For the gluino case, the reach of the \texttt{SR\_ej} search is shown in turquoise and the combined reach of \texttt{SR\_ej} + \texttt{SR\_e3j} is shown in purple. For the bino case we just show the reach of \texttt{SR\_ej}. In both plots we show in gray the area excluded by existing experiments: Drell-Yan~\cite{CMS:2021ctt}, charged current universality~\cite{Barger:1989rk} and squark pair production~\cite{ATLAS:2020dsk,Beenakker:2011fu,Bornhauser:2007bf}, with each region labeled by its corresponding cause of exclusion. Finally, we show the projected limits assuming $\mathcal{L}=\SI{3}{\atto\barn^{-1}}$ for both Drell-Yan, and squark pair production as dashed grey lines.

Projected constraints based on integrated luminosities of $(150,300,3000)\SI{}{\,\femto\barn^{-1}}$ shown as blue-$($solid, dashed, dot-dashed$)$ contours. These constraints are shown as a function of the branching ratios into the two channels: ($i$) 1 jet + $X$, ($ii$) $\geq 3$ jets + $X$ where $X$ denotes either an electron or a neutrino. As reference points, we show the expected branching ratios for an RPV model featuring a \SI{1}{\TeV} gluino, bino or wino-LSP, see \cref{sec:model} for more details. \textbf{Left:} We vary the systematic uncertainty on the background predictions in both channels (1\%, 10\% and 30\%) showing how the exclusion limits change. \textbf{Right:} We study how varying the QCD background rate for the three jet channel from the assumed 30\% affects our results.

Projected constraints based on integrated luminosities of $(150,300,3000)\SI{}{\,\femto\barn^{-1}}$ shown as blue-$($solid, dashed, dot-dashed$)$ contours. These constraints are shown as a function of the branching ratios into the two channels: ($i$) 1 jet + $X$, ($ii$) $\geq 3$ jets + $X$ where $X$ denotes either an electron or a neutrino. As reference points, we show the expected branching ratios for an RPV model featuring a \SI{1}{\TeV} gluino, bino or wino-LSP, see \cref{sec:model} for more details. \textbf{Left:} We vary the systematic uncertainty on the background predictions in both channels (1\%, 10\% and 30\%) showing how the exclusion limits change. \textbf{Right:} We study how varying the QCD background rate for the three jet channel from the assumed 30\% affects our results.