CERN Accelerating science

The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus \ct{} with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for \BpJpsiKp{} (upper left), \LambJpsiLam{} (upper right), \BdJpsiKshort{} (centre left), \BdJpsiKstar{} (centre right), \BsJpsiPiPi{} (lower left), and \BsJpsiPhi{} (lower right). The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus \ct{} with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for \BpJpsiKp{} (upper left), \LambJpsiLam{} (upper right), \BdJpsiKshort{} (centre left), \BdJpsiKstar{} (centre right), \BsJpsiPiPi{} (lower left), and \BsJpsiPhi{} (lower right). The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus \ct{} with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for \BpJpsiKp{} (upper left), \LambJpsiLam{} (upper right), \BdJpsiKshort{} (centre left), \BdJpsiKstar{} (centre right), \BsJpsiPiPi{} (lower left), and \BsJpsiPhi{} (lower right). The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus \ct{} with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for \BpJpsiKp{} (upper left), \LambJpsiLam{} (upper right), \BdJpsiKshort{} (centre left), \BdJpsiKstar{} (centre right), \BsJpsiPiPi{} (lower left), and \BsJpsiPhi{} (lower right). The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus \ct{} with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for \BpJpsiKp{} (upper left), \LambJpsiLam{} (upper right), \BdJpsiKshort{} (centre left), \BdJpsiKstar{} (centre right), \BsJpsiPiPi{} (lower left), and \BsJpsiPhi{} (lower right). The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

The combined reconstruction and selection efficiency from simulation versus \ct{} with a superimposed fit to an inverse power function for \BpJpsiKp{} (upper left), \LambJpsiLam{} (upper right), \BdJpsiKshort{} (centre left), \BdJpsiKstar{} (centre right), \BsJpsiPiPi{} (lower left), and \BsJpsiPhi{} (lower right). The efficiency scale is arbitrary.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bu{} (upper) and for \PbgLp{} (lower) candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bu{} (upper) and for \PbgLp{} (lower) candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bu{} (upper) and for \PbgLp{} (lower) candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bu{} (upper) and for \PbgLp{} (lower) candidates. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bd{} candidates reconstructed from \JpsiKstar{} (upper) and \JpsiKshort{} (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bd{} candidates reconstructed from \JpsiKstar{} (upper) and \JpsiKshort{} (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bd{} candidates reconstructed from \JpsiKstar{} (upper) and \JpsiKshort{} (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bd{} candidates reconstructed from \JpsiKstar{} (upper) and \JpsiKshort{} (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the contributions from signal (dashed), background (dotted), and the sum of signal and background (solid) shown. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bs{} candidates reconstructed from \JpsiPhi{} (upper) and \JpsiPiPi{} (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified \BpJpsiKp{} background (dashed-dotted), \BdJpsiPiPi{} contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified \PB{} backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bs{} candidates reconstructed from \JpsiPhi{} (upper) and \JpsiPiPi{} (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified \BpJpsiKp{} background (dashed-dotted), \BdJpsiPiPi{} contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified \PB{} backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bs{} candidates reconstructed from \JpsiPhi{} (upper) and \JpsiPiPi{} (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified \BpJpsiKp{} background (dashed-dotted), \BdJpsiPiPi{} contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified \PB{} backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Invariant mass (left) and \ct (right) distributions for \Bs{} candidates reconstructed from \JpsiPhi{} (upper) and \JpsiPiPi{} (lower) decays. The curves are projections of the fit to the data, with the full fit function (solid) and signal (dashed) shown for both decays, the total background (dotted) shown for the upper plots, and the combinatorial background (dotted), misidentified \BpJpsiKp{} background (dashed-dotted), \BdJpsiPiPi{} contribution (dashed-dotted-dotted-dotted), and partially reconstructed and other misidentified \PB{} backgrounds (dashed-dotted-dotted) shown for the lower plots. the lower panels of the figures on the right show the difference between the observed data and the fit divided by the data uncertainty. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

The \JpsiPi invariant mass distribution (left) with the solid line representing the total fit, the dashed line the signal component, the dotted line the combinatorial background, and the dashed-dotted line the contribution from \BcJpsiKp decays. The \JpsiK invariant mass distribution (right) with the solid line representing the total fit, the dashed line the signal component, the dotted-dashed curves the $\PBp \!\to\! \JPsi \Pgpp$ and \PBz{} contributions, and the dotted curve the combinatorial background. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

The \JpsiPi invariant mass distribution (left) with the solid line representing the total fit, the dashed line the signal component, the dotted line the combinatorial background, and the dashed-dotted line the contribution from \BcJpsiKp decays. The \JpsiK invariant mass distribution (right) with the solid line representing the total fit, the dashed line the signal component, the dotted-dashed curves the $\PBp \!\to\! \JPsi \Pgpp$ and \PBz{} contributions, and the dotted curve the combinatorial background. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties.

Yields of \BcJpsiPip and \BJpsiKp events (left) as a function of \ct, normalized to the bin width, as determined from fits to the invariant mass distributions. Ratio of the \PBc and \PBp{} efficiency distributions (right) as a function of \ct, as determined from simulated events. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, and the horizontal bars show the bin widths.

Yields of \BcJpsiPip and \BJpsiKp events (left) as a function of \ct, normalized to the bin width, as determined from fits to the invariant mass distributions. Ratio of the \PBc and \PBp{} efficiency distributions (right) as a function of \ct, as determined from simulated events. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties, and the horizontal bars show the bin widths.

Ratio of the \PBc to \PBp{} efficiency-corrected \ct distributions, $R/R_{\varepsilon}$, with a line showing the result of the fit to an exponential function. The vertical bars give the statistical uncertainty in the data, and the horizontal bars show the bin widths.