Sam Rankin
Sam Rankin (Libertarian Party) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent Montana's 2nd Congressional District. He lost in the general election on November 8, 2022.
Rankin completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.
Rankin was a 2014 independent candidate who sought election to the U.S. Senate from Montana.[1] He decided to withdraw from the race in April 2014 and instead supported John Bohlinger in the Democratic primary.[2]
Rankin was previously a 2012 Democratic candidate who sought election to the U.S. House to represent the At-Large Congressional District of Montana. Rankin was defeated by Kim Gillan in the Democratic primary on June 5, 2012.[3]
Biography
Sam Rankin was born in Billings, Montana. He served in the U.S. Army from 1968 to 1970. Rankin graduated from Billings West High School in 1963. He earned a bachelor's degree in biology from Eastern Montana College (now Montana State University at Billings) and a law degree from the University of North Dakota School of Law in 2018. His career experience includes working as an attorney, as a public health and nutrition teacher with the Peace Corps, and a biology teacher with Montana public schools. He also founded First Choice Real Estate.[4][5]
Elections
2022
See also: Montana's 2nd Congressional District election, 2022
General election
General election for U.S. House Montana District 2
Incumbent Matt Rosendale defeated Gary Buchanan, Penny Ronning, and Sam Rankin in the general election for U.S. House Montana District 2 on November 8, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Matt Rosendale (R) | 56.6 | 121,979 | |
Gary Buchanan (Independent) | 21.9 | 47,195 | ||
Penny Ronning (D) | 20.2 | 43,480 | ||
Sam Rankin (L) | 1.4 | 3,018 |
Total votes: 215,672 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Democratic primary election
Democratic primary for U.S. House Montana District 2
Penny Ronning defeated Mark Sweeney (Unofficially withdrew) and Skylar Williams in the Democratic primary for U.S. House Montana District 2 on June 7, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Penny Ronning | 58.5 | 21,983 | |
Mark Sweeney (Unofficially withdrew) | 22.8 | 8,586 | ||
Skylar Williams | 18.7 | 7,029 |
Total votes: 37,598 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Withdrawn or disqualified candidates
- Laurie Bishop (D)
- Jack Ballard (D)
Republican primary election
Republican primary for U.S. House Montana District 2
Incumbent Matt Rosendale defeated Kyle Austin, Charles A. Walking Child, and James Boyette in the Republican primary for U.S. House Montana District 2 on June 7, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Matt Rosendale | 75.7 | 73,453 | |
Kyle Austin | 12.3 | 11,930 | ||
Charles A. Walking Child | 6.1 | 5,909 | ||
James Boyette | 5.9 | 5,712 |
Total votes: 97,004 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
Libertarian primary election
Libertarian primary for U.S. House Montana District 2
Sam Rankin defeated Samuel Thomas and Roger Roots in the Libertarian primary for U.S. House Montana District 2 on June 7, 2022.
Candidate | % | Votes | ||
✔ | Sam Rankin | 47.0 | 958 | |
Samuel Thomas | 27.2 | 554 | ||
Roger Roots | 25.8 | 526 |
Total votes: 2,038 | ||||
= candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey. | ||||
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey. | ||||
Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team. |
2014
Rankin ran in the 2014 election for the U.S. Senate, to represent Montana. He dropped out of the race in April 2014 and announced that he would support Democratic candidate John Bohlinger instead. Bohlinger lost in the Democratic primary.[2]
2012
Rankin ran in the 2012 election for the U.S. House to represent Montana's at-large House seat. He faced Kim Gillan, Diane Smith, Dave Strohmaier, Rob Stutz, Franke Wilmer and Jason Ward in the Democratic primary. Rankin was defeated by Kim Gillan in the Democratic primary on June 5, 2012.[3][6]
Campaign themes
2022
Ballotpedia survey responses
See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection
Sam Rankin completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Rankin's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.
Collapse all
|Born in Billings Montana, 77 years old. B.A. Eastern Montana College, 1968. Peace Corps, India 44-A, 1967 (came back early due to sickness).
Combat Medic, US Army, Vietnam, 1969-70. Married with children, 40 years. Montana licensed real estate broker since 1973.
Law Degree from University of North Dakota, 2019. Montana licensed attorney since 2019.
- Corporate, PAC, and lobbyist's money is causing Congress to vote for their interersts and not the public's interests.
- Money is the problem, not political ideology.
- We need politicians who are not controlled by big money interests and therefore can compromise and advance the public's interests.
Environment, Housing, and Defense.
An official who has show an interest in helping people before being elected. We now have elected officials who are, quite frankly, punks, or who have made fortunes (goal: make money, not helping people), and celebrities with nothing but whatever brought them celebrity status, think TV.
Combat in U.S. Army and working toward a common goal. I worked with people I didn’t like (I’m sure it was mutual), but we were nonetheless a cohesive group that worked together and accomplished common goals
Like Jeannette Rankin, the first woman to hold federal office, who broke the male dominated Congress, I would like to be remembered as the first candidate who got through to the voters that it's the money from corporations, PAC's, and lobbyists that causes politicians to vote against the will of the American people. Voting against the will of the people is what is now causing the deep anger and disgust with Congress. It is not about philosophy, but the attitude of "my way or I will vote no!"
Soda-Jerk. and I worked there summers through high school. I was hired at a local drive-inn hamburger spot to pick up the lot and then work the fountain. It was actually just like what you would see in department store lunch counters, actual push-pumps to get the different flavors and an ice cream machine I had to pour in 4% butterfat content mix to make milk shakes which were then put on a high-speed blender.
My father dying while I was in grade school and not having a father figure. My mother and sister did their best.
The drowning out of what the majority of American's want Congress to do by use of the rich, corporations, PAC's, and lobbyist's money. Money is not speech. Hiring 100 people to yell support for a policy is very different than verbally convincing 100 people to yell support for that policy.
The excess money also helps bad politicians to stay in office by allowing them to spend enough money to overwhelm voter's senses with negative, divisive, and angry ads against their opponents. If you repeat a lie enough, people will end up believing it.
No,. It should be longer. With the speed of communication and no need to travel by horseback to Congress, it's a burden to worry about the next election which, in essence, is right around the corner the day you win.
Two bums sitting in an alley leaning against a building and holding a sack with the neck of a bottle sticking out: "it's a good wine, but it's not a great wine.
Two ladies sitting in a bar and one says: "I'd give a $1,000 to be one of those millionaires."
Yes, compromise is a basis for my campaign. It's simple. That is what a democracy is all about? Unfortunately, the unruly, rude, and loud have convinced voters it has to be 'their' way or it's wrong. Compromise doesn't mean I would give in when discussing any specific subject. It implies the other side is operating in good faith. Currently that is not the case and I hope the voters in November vote out extremists and Congress can then get back to a semblance of doing the work of the American people.
Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.
Campaign website
Rankin's campaign website stated the following:
“ |
THE ISSUE 98% OF OUR REPRESENTATIVES ARE RE-ELECTED As long as they do what they're told. Watch the movie clip Americans believe their representatives are bought, and they are. The guaranteed campaign financing that flows from corporations & special interests along with a barrage of "issue" advertising from anonymous sources has corrupted every aspect of our government. Our representatives are forced to court special interests in order to get the money needed to be reelected and keep their jobs. Federal term limits are not the solution Special interests will simply focus their financial muscle on the successful election of their next choice to represent them in Congress. Beholden to the people or industry that put them there, the new representatives will do what they are told. Money is not speech Until we get rid of the Supreme Court's damaging Citizens United decision, the pernicious corruption it has brought to our democracy will continue. There will be no civilized debate, only the financial incentive to manufacture more outrage.
BUT, YES, THERE ARE OTHER ISSUES. --I am pro-choice. Government should be kept out of the matter. It is a question for individuals and families alone. -Carbon based energy suppliers have subsidies that are no longer justified. I will work toward eliminating them over time. -Small business is essential to the American Dream. I would support “value added” programs, with sunset provisions, to encourage, promote, and help start new businesses in rural communities. -Government needs to reflect and encourage individual responsibility and accountability in its legislation and functioning. -Our children are our future. It is high time we stopped letting the federal government dictate their education, nor small vocal parent groups with agendas other than education. Parents with education as primary goal, know what's best. -Far too many people and businesses are dependent upon government checks and tax breaks that cost us all but benefit the very few. If elected, I will vote to trim back the programs that are "giveaways" and no longer justified. -Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices, relationships, and marry whomever they want regardless of sexual orientation, preference, or gender. -I will not support cut backs of veterans programs. -High income & non-tenant corporate farm/ranch owners should be limited in amounts they receive in government subsidies and direct cash payments. -The environmental community in Montana is an active watchdog for corporate environmental abuse and I will work to ensure those groups continue their work. -Health insurance programs should encourage people to take care of THEIR OWN health & work toward rewarding those who practice health life styles. -Federal block grants to Montana should be honestly apportioned to American Indian entities & I would support direct funding if appropriate. -I support the right to hold one's personal beliefs without interference from those with different beliefs.[7] |
” |
—Sam Rankin's campaign website (2022)[8] |
Campaign finance summary
Note: The finance data shown here comes from the disclosures required of candidates and parties. Depending on the election or state, this may represent only a portion of all the funds spent on their behalf. Satellite spending groups may or may not have expended funds related to the candidate or politician on whose page you are reading this disclaimer. Campaign finance data from elections may be incomplete. For elections to federal offices, complete data can be found at the FEC website. Click here for more on federal campaign finance law and here for more on state campaign finance law.
Personal
Note: Please contact us if the personal information below requires an update.
Sam married in 1973 and divorced in 1977 and has a son from that marriage. Sam married Diane Williams of Billings in 1983, and they have two daughters.[4]
See also
2022 Elections
External links
Candidate U.S. House Montana District 2 |
Footnotes
- ↑ Ballot Access News, "Sam Rankin Will Attempt to be First Independent Candidate for U.S. Senator on Montana Ballot Since 1936," February 10, 2014
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 News Talk KGVO, "Sam Rankin Quits Independent U.S. Senate Bid, Supports John Bohlinger," accessed October 2, 2014
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Montana Secretary of State, "Election Results" accessed June 5, 2012
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Sam Rankin for Congress, "Biography", April 18, 2012
- ↑ Information submitted to Ballotpedia through the Candidate Connection survey on May 6, 2022.
- ↑ Montana Secretary of State, "2012 Primary Results," accessed July 23, 2012
- ↑ Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
- ↑ Rankin for Congress, “Home,” accessed August 26, 2022